2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional and inverted organic photovoltaic devices with controlled illumination area and extraction layers

Abstract: The impact of device architecture on organic photovoltaic device performance has been problematic to quantify due to extraction layer materials and device testing issues. In particular, published reports have used different pairs of hole and electron extraction layer materials for conventional versus inverted devices. The origins of the large apparent discrepancy in device J-V characteristics become difficult to understand, arising from differences in built-in potentials and in the extraction layers' conductiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, similar to the conventional OSC, as the peak of J SC was wider, an optimal active layer thickness in the range 90 nm to 115 nm was used. It was also distinctively conclusive that the inverted OSC gave a higher J SC than the conventional OSC, which also agreed with the experimental result [52].…”
Section: Optimizing Thickness Of Al In Inverted Oscsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, similar to the conventional OSC, as the peak of J SC was wider, an optimal active layer thickness in the range 90 nm to 115 nm was used. It was also distinctively conclusive that the inverted OSC gave a higher J SC than the conventional OSC, which also agreed with the experimental result [52].…”
Section: Optimizing Thickness Of Al In Inverted Oscsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…P3HT, the most well-studied polymer in OPVs, is known to be p-type doped with a background carrier density of 5 × 10 15 to 5 × 10 16 cm -3 [5,7,39]. While the optimal thickness for P3HT:PC 61 BM OPVs is ~ 200 nm [33], devices with thickness varying between 100 [38] and 800 nm [40] have been studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To expand the active layer’s absorption range, tandem OSCs have been proposed to stack two single-junctions with different absorption ranges [ 49 , 50 ]. According to the charge flow direction, OSCs can be divided into conventional and inverted devices (see Figure 1 ) [ 51 ]. Under light irradiation, photons are absorbed by the donor material in the active layer to form excited states, called excitons, which are bound electron-hole pairs.…”
Section: Structure and Characterization Of Organic Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%