2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Conventional TNM and Novel TNMB Staging Systems for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: Key PointsQuestionCompared with conventional TNM staging for non–small cell lung cancer, does incorporation of a molecular prognostic classifier by the TNMB staging system improve estimation of disease-free survival?FindingsIn this cohort study of 238 patients who underwent surgical resection of non–small cell lung cancer, 66.8% of patients were reclassified using the molecular prognostic classifier within the TNMB staging system. The eighth edition of the TNM system, compared with the seventh edition of the T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent past, efforts have been made to increase the inclusion of molecular markers in clinical staging of NSCLC. 51,52 Patients with localized stage disease do not receive routine molecular analysis, and current recommendations limit next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing to those with advanced-stage NSCLC. 53,54 This leads to low-resolution risk stratification and missing out of high-risk patients who would profit from different treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent past, efforts have been made to increase the inclusion of molecular markers in clinical staging of NSCLC. 51,52 Patients with localized stage disease do not receive routine molecular analysis, and current recommendations limit next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing to those with advanced-stage NSCLC. 53,54 This leads to low-resolution risk stratification and missing out of high-risk patients who would profit from different treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staging refinement using the 14-gene lung cancer assay It has been previously established that biological molecular signatures can refine prognosis in patients with other types of malignancies [45,46], though such molecular predictors have yet to be formally incorporated into the established TNM staging system for lung cancer [17,36]. The utilization of the 14-gene lung cancer assay as a complement to conventional staging has been evaluated, and it has been shown to improve survival predictions [47,48].…”
Section: A 14-gene Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Assay For Early-stage Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings demonstrate improved prognostic ability of the TNMB staging system in a way that has been difficult to attain with reorganization of conventional nonmolecular approaches alone. Following retrospective analysis, a prospective validation was performed [48]. In a prospective cohort study, 238 patients with stage I-IIIC nonsquamous NSCLC underwent surgical resection and prognostic assay evaluation at the time of cancer treatment at UCSF.…”
Section: A 14-gene Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Assay For Early-stage Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict which patients may recur after surgery, clinicians have traditionally grouped patients using the TNM (Tumor, Node, Metastasis) staging system 4 . Multiple groups, however, have identified molecular signatures that more accurately predict recurrence and mortality beyond conventional TNM staging 5 13 . These signatures are based on a variety of genetic, genomic, and epigenetic biomarkers prognostic of recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%