2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Coulomb-2, NASCAP-2K, MUSCAT and SPIS codes for geosynchronous spacecraft charging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various codes for modeling these charges in GEO orbit are shown in. 7,8 The charge levels developed range from 1 to 10 kV, which is within the charging levels achieved on the SCATHA and ATS missions. Electrostatic actuation has many merits over conventional thrusters, such as electric propulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various codes for modeling these charges in GEO orbit are shown in. 7,8 The charge levels developed range from 1 to 10 kV, which is within the charging levels achieved on the SCATHA and ATS missions. Electrostatic actuation has many merits over conventional thrusters, such as electric propulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Hence, we have ignored the term while keeping the gravity gradient torque contribution in the equation. Equation (7) gives the relation between change in time varying relative length, δL and charge variation, δQ of the spacecraft. Next, we employ gravity gradient torque to stabilize angles ψ b and f b .…”
Section: System Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%