2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0340-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study

Abstract: Background: Carotid artery atherosclerosis is an important risk factor for stroke. As such, quantitative imaging of carotid artery calcification, as a proxy of atherosclerosis, has become a cornerstone of current stroke research. Yet, population-based data comparing the computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the detection and quantification of calcification remain scarce.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol included four sequences in axial plane: a proton density weighted (PDw)-fast spin echo (FSE)-black blood (BB) sequence (in-plane resolution 130/160 × 130/128 = 0.8 × 1 cm); a PDw-FSE-BB with an increased in-plane resolution (in-plane resolution 130/224 × 130/160 = 0.5 × 0.8 cm); a PDw-echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence (in-plane resolution 130/160 × 70/160 = 0.8 × 0.4 cm); a T2-weighted-EPI sequence (in-plane resolution 130/160 × 70/160 = 0.8 × 0.4 cm) and two three-dimensional (3D) sequences: a 3D-T1-weighted (T1w)-gradient echo sequence (in-plane resolution 180/192 × 180/180 = 0.9 × 1 cm), and a 3 D phased-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (3D-PC-MRA) (in-plane resolution 180/256 × 180/128 = 0.7 × 1.4 cm). 16 More details of the scanning protocol, reading procedure, and reproducibility are described in detail elsewhere. 17 The images of the carotid were evaluated for the presence of three different plaque components: IPH, lipid core, and calcification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The protocol included four sequences in axial plane: a proton density weighted (PDw)-fast spin echo (FSE)-black blood (BB) sequence (in-plane resolution 130/160 × 130/128 = 0.8 × 1 cm); a PDw-FSE-BB with an increased in-plane resolution (in-plane resolution 130/224 × 130/160 = 0.5 × 0.8 cm); a PDw-echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence (in-plane resolution 130/160 × 70/160 = 0.8 × 0.4 cm); a T2-weighted-EPI sequence (in-plane resolution 130/160 × 70/160 = 0.8 × 0.4 cm) and two three-dimensional (3D) sequences: a 3D-T1-weighted (T1w)-gradient echo sequence (in-plane resolution 180/192 × 180/180 = 0.9 × 1 cm), and a 3 D phased-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (3D-PC-MRA) (in-plane resolution 180/256 × 180/128 = 0.7 × 1.4 cm). 16 More details of the scanning protocol, reading procedure, and reproducibility are described in detail elsewhere. 17 The images of the carotid were evaluated for the presence of three different plaque components: IPH, lipid core, and calcification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcification was defined as the presence of a hypointense region in the plaque on all sequences. 16 , 18 , 19 Intraplaque haemorrhage was defined as the presence of a hyperintense region in the atherosclerotic plaque on 3D-T1w-GRE. 20 , 21 Lipid core presence was defined as a hypointense region, not classified as IPH or calcification, in the plaque on PDw-FSE or PDw-EPI and T2w-EPI images or a region of relative signal intensity drop in the T2w-EPI images compared with the PDw-EPI images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid core presence was defined as a hypointense region, not classified as IPH or calcification, in the plaque on PDw-FSE or PDw-EPI and T2w-EPI images or a region of relative signal intensity drop in the T2w-EPI images compared with the PDw-EPI images. Calcification was defined as the presence of a hypointense region in the plaque on all sequences (14). Subjects were recorded as positive for the presence of any plaque component if the component was identified in one or both carotid arteries.…”
Section: Carotid Scanning and Analysis Of Plaque Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Mujaj et al87 compared CT‐ and cardiac magnetic resonance–based volumes of carotid artery calcification and established that they were highly correlated with each other. However, cardiac magnetic resonance–based calcification is systematically smaller than those obtained by CT.…”
Section: Multimodality Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%