2015
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201400597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of detection techniques for capillary electrophoresis analysis of gold nanoparticles

Abstract: As metallic nanoparticles are growing in importance as analytes in CE, increases an interest in appropriate detection methods for their quantification in various samples. For gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), the most common UV detection poses intricacy of inadequate sensitivity that hinders the applicability of CE. With the objective of resolving this challenge, UV detection was compared with C(4) D and ICP-MS as alternative modes of detection for AuNPs. A C(4) D detector, applied under pressure-driven conditions, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.6 pmol, for an injection volume of 85 nL). Significantly lower values have been obviously achieved when using detection modes like ICP‐MS which are surely more sensitive while involving expensive and complex instrumentation. Really, the separation approach developed in the present work was not aimed to overcome the limited sensitivity of UV‐Vis detection but rather to improve resolution by emphasizing the retardation and relaxation effects on AuNP electrophoretic moving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.6 pmol, for an injection volume of 85 nL). Significantly lower values have been obviously achieved when using detection modes like ICP‐MS which are surely more sensitive while involving expensive and complex instrumentation. Really, the separation approach developed in the present work was not aimed to overcome the limited sensitivity of UV‐Vis detection but rather to improve resolution by emphasizing the retardation and relaxation effects on AuNP electrophoretic moving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For gold NPs, CE‐ICP‐MS gained the LOD as low as 2 × 10 −15 M, as well as an excellent performance in terms of signal stability and linearity. This was demonstrated by probing the interaction between gold NPs and the main blood‐transporting protein, human serum albumin . The studies on the interaction of gold‐containing drug, auranofin, and plasma proteins proved that cysteine‐34 was the main reaction site for auranofin in human serum albumin, the major auranofin‐interacting protein in plasma .…”
Section: Development Of Methodology and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the rules of their intended use the metallic nanoparticles are designed to be fairly stable against aggregation or agglomeration under blood electrolyte conditions. Therefore, neutral BGEs based on Good's buffers are of preferable choice to study biointeractions of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) (HEPES ) or nanorods (AuNRs) (PIPES ), silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) (CHES ), quantum dots (QDs) (HEPES ), or iron‐oxide nanoparticles (MOPS ). Peak dispersion challenge due to the tendency of nanoparticles, having large specific areas, to adsorb onto the capillary wall is greatly bypassed by using such BGEs that impart negative surface charge and sufficient electrostatic repulsion.…”
Section: Ce Methodology In Nano–bio Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak dispersion challenge due to the tendency of nanoparticles, having large specific areas, to adsorb onto the capillary wall is greatly bypassed by using such BGEs that impart negative surface charge and sufficient electrostatic repulsion. On the other hand, high‐salt electrolytes though physiologically welcome are to be avoided because of detection system incompatibility . Obviously, when analyzing nanoparticles exposed to human serum via ex vivo incubation, the number of bioconjugates to resolve increases (see Section ) and more effort is required to gain the baseline separation .…”
Section: Ce Methodology In Nano–bio Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%