2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/485684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different EHG Feature Selection Methods for the Detection of Preterm Labor

Abstract: Numerous types of linear and nonlinear features have been extracted from the electrohysterogram (EHG) in order to classify labor and pregnancy contractions. As a result, the number of available features is now very large. The goal of this study is to reduce the number of features by selecting only the relevant ones which are useful for solving the classification problem. This paper presents three methods for feature subset selection that can be applied to choose the best subsets for classifying labor and pregn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
41
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, Alamedine et al (Alamedine, Khalil, & Marque, 2013) This has been achieved by using an algorithm that generates the Tocography TOCO signal, derived from the EHG, and detects windows with significant changes in amplitude. In order to develop the classifier, a total of eleven spectral, temporal, and nonlinear features were extracted from the EHG signal windows of 12 women, which were classed by experts as being in the first stages of labour.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Alamedine et al (Alamedine, Khalil, & Marque, 2013) This has been achieved by using an algorithm that generates the Tocography TOCO signal, derived from the EHG, and detects windows with significant changes in amplitude. In order to develop the classifier, a total of eleven spectral, temporal, and nonlinear features were extracted from the EHG signal windows of 12 women, which were classed by experts as being in the first stages of labour.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using uterine contractions of the 964 EHG records, and the frequency band of 0.34-1.0 Hz, the reported performance in 965 predicting preterm delivery within seven days (using peak frequency of the power 966 spectrum and propagation velocity), in terms of AU C was 96% [10]. Considering the 967 use of uterine contractions of EHG records, and the frequency band spreading below 968 and above 1.0 Hz, examples of the highest reported performances in classifying between 969 pregnancy and labor contractions in terms of correct classification were 88.72% (using 970 Lyapunov exponent, variance entropy, wavelets related features, the QDA classifier, and 971 133 pregnancy and 133 labor contractions) [20]; in terms of AU C were 85% (using 972 non-linear correlation coefficient, 174/115 pregnancy/labor contractions) [25], 84.2%…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To assess the 433 classification performance of the variety of classification tasks, and for the easier and 434 consistent comparison of the performance results obtained, the same classifier, i.e., the 435 QDA classifier, was used in each case. In comparison to a few other standard classifiers, 436 the QDA classifier already reliably classified between pregnancy and labor 437 contractions [20], and between preterm and term, early and later records of the TPEHG 438 DB [33], therefore the QDA classifier seems suitable for the domain of predicting 439 preterm birth. In the scope of this study, we have also preliminarily tested a few other 440 standard classifiers: naive Bayes, k nearest neighbour, linear discriminant analysis, 441 decision tree, and support vector machine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, Alamedine et al (Alamedine, Khalil, & Marque, 2013) presented three techniques to identify the most useful features relevant for contraction classification. These included linear features, such as peak frequency, mean frequency and root mean square, and nonlinear features, such as the Lyapunov exponent and sample entropy.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%