2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different linear calibration approaches for LC–MS bioanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Materials and Reagents. BMS-790052 (daclatasvir) and 13 C 2 15 N 4 -daclatasvir were synthesized at Bristol-Myers Squibb. Formic acid (SupraPur grade), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ, USA).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Materials and Reagents. BMS-790052 (daclatasvir) and 13 C 2 15 N 4 -daclatasvir were synthesized at Bristol-Myers Squibb. Formic acid (SupraPur grade), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ, USA).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to improve the assay throughput and robustness, it is highly desired to simplify and, if possible, eliminate the steps for preparation of multisample external calibration curves and dilution of study samples. Several groups have reported their efforts to simplify the preparation of multisample external calibration curves by using one- or two-point calibration curves and to eliminate the dilution of study samples by expending the calibration curve ranges , or using internal standard tracked dilution …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were additionally used for assessing accuracy and precision in order to check whether one-point [32] or two-point [33] calibration could be applicable saving time and resources. For the calibration standards, the back-calculated concentrations fulfilled the acceptance criteria of EMA (accuracy: bias ≤ 15%, ≤ 20% at LLOQ; precision: CV ≤ 15%, ≤ 20% at LLOQ).…”
Section: Calibration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate two-point calibration, accuracy and precision data for the QC samples (Table 3) were calculated using calibrator pair 1/6, chosen according to Tan et al [33]. These data were systematically compared to the respective results calculated with full linear calibration ignoring zero as described above, as this calibration was superior to that through zero.…”
Section: Accuracy and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation