2003
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2003.385.390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Methods of Evaluating Genotypes in National Uniformity Wheat Yield Trials in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this measure a genotype is considered stable only if value of coefficient of determination (R i ²) is large. Several of these stability parameters have been used by different researchers such as (Lin et al, 1986;Masood et al, 2003;Shah et al, 2009). Statistical data analysis was carried out using different statistical software namely Minitab v. 16 and GEA-R v. 2.0 (CIMMYT, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this measure a genotype is considered stable only if value of coefficient of determination (R i ²) is large. Several of these stability parameters have been used by different researchers such as (Lin et al, 1986;Masood et al, 2003;Shah et al, 2009). Statistical data analysis was carried out using different statistical software namely Minitab v. 16 and GEA-R v. 2.0 (CIMMYT, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%