2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.12.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different numerical Laplace inversion methods for engineering applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[15] Dispersion Coefficient Figure 3 demonstrates the dimensionless dispersion coefficients for the chemical species transports in tubes with constant wall and inlet concentrations versus the Peclet number using Equations (24) and (25). The results reveal that the dispersion coefficient for a tube with constant wall and zero inlet concentrations is less than the dispersion coefficient for a tube with a constant inlet concentration and a no-flux boundary condition at the wall.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15] Dispersion Coefficient Figure 3 demonstrates the dimensionless dispersion coefficients for the chemical species transports in tubes with constant wall and inlet concentrations versus the Peclet number using Equations (24) and (25). The results reveal that the dispersion coefficient for a tube with constant wall and zero inlet concentrations is less than the dispersion coefficient for a tube with a constant inlet concentration and a no-flux boundary condition at the wall.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By applying a numerical Laplace inversion technique, [25,26] the time domain solutions can be determined for the problem under study. Here, the method of Fourier series [27] is used to obtain the concentration in the time domain as follows:…”
Section: Solution Of the Governing Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, the large value of parameter N determines a more accurate solution but if N is too large, the results may be worsened due to round-off errors. Thus, a suitable choice of value N is important to achieve the most accurate solution [6]. Many authors propose a different value of the parameter N to obtain the most accurate solution.…”
Section: The Gaver-stehfest Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, an analytical inversion of a Laplace domain solution is di¢ cult to obtain; therefore, a numerical inversion method must be used. A nice comparison of four frequently used numerical Laplace inversion algorithms is given by Hassan Hassanzadeh, Mehran Pooladi-Darvish [18]. In this work we use the Stehfest's algorithm [28] that is easy to implement.…”
Section: Existence Of the Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%