2003
DOI: 10.1892/0891-6640(2003)017<0033:codait>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Tests for Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth and Antibiotic-Responsive Diarrhea in Dogs

Abstract: Controversy exists over the diagnosis of idiopathic small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in dogs and some clinicians use the term antibiotic-responsive diarrhea (ARD) in preference. However, whether such terms are interchangeable is not clear. To examine the relationship between duodenal bacterial numbers and a clinical response to antibiotics, SIBO and ARD were defined by nonoverlapping criteria. Quantitative duodenal juice bacteriology and indirect serum biochemical tests were used to assess small in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A report of IBD in a dog has suggested a tendency toward cobalamin deficiency [7]. In the present case, the serum cobalamin concentration before MTX administration was low at 97 pg/ml (lower limit of normal range=215 pg/ml [7]). However, cobalamin levels improved in response to 6 weeks of MTX with cobalamin supplementation.…”
contrasting
confidence: 38%
“…A report of IBD in a dog has suggested a tendency toward cobalamin deficiency [7]. In the present case, the serum cobalamin concentration before MTX administration was low at 97 pg/ml (lower limit of normal range=215 pg/ml [7]). However, cobalamin levels improved in response to 6 weeks of MTX with cobalamin supplementation.…”
contrasting
confidence: 38%
“…Cultivation results Much of the published data describing the composition of the gastrointestinal microbial ecosystem in dogs and cats has been generated using bacterial cultivation techniques. [26][27][28][29][30] These studies have revealed that total bacterial counts in the stomach range between 10 1 and 10 6 cfu/g or ml. 26 The bacterial load in the duodenum and jejunum of dogs and cats shows pronounced individual variations.…”
Section: Bacteria In the Gi Tract Of Dogs And Catsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duodenal bacterial counts are low in most dogs (<10 3 cfu/g or ml of duodenal aspirates), but they may reach up 10 9 cfu/g or ml in some dogs. 29,30 The feline duodenum reportedly harbors higher bacterial counts (10 5 -10 8 cfu/g or ml), and anaerobic bacteria (Bacteroides spp, Fusobacterium spp, Eubacterium spp) appear to predominate unlike in dogs. 29 The bacterial counts found in the proximal small intestine of some healthy dogs and cats are substantially higher than typically found in humans, where bacterial counts greater than 10 5 cfu/g or ml of small bowel aspirates indicate small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO).…”
Section: Bacteria In the Gi Tract Of Dogs And Catsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the pathogenesis of the disease has not been completely clarified yet, some reports in human medicine and laboratory animals have demonstrated underlying genetic factors related to the disease [5]. In veterinary medicine, some breeds are known to be predisposed to specific types of chronic enteropathy, such as protein-losing enteropathy and nephropathy in the Soft Coated Wheaten Terrier [18], immunoproliferative enteropathy in the Basenji [3] and chronic enteropathy and ARD in the German Shepherd [2,11]. The existence of so-called breed-specific chronic enteropathy implies that some kinds of genetic factors are associated with the pathogenesis of the disease in dogs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%