2019
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2019.1691227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of distribution selection methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare which distribution fits best to the data, a recent study analyzed the robustness of different methods of comparing fitted distributions such as AIC (Akaike Information Criterion), BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion), LRT (log-likelihood ration test), etc. [39]. AIC and BIC measure the performance of the models based on their complexity.…”
Section: Data Driven Analysis For Quantitative Data: Risk Profile Ana...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To compare which distribution fits best to the data, a recent study analyzed the robustness of different methods of comparing fitted distributions such as AIC (Akaike Information Criterion), BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion), LRT (log-likelihood ration test), etc. [39]. AIC and BIC measure the performance of the models based on their complexity.…”
Section: Data Driven Analysis For Quantitative Data: Risk Profile Ana...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AIC is a prediction error estimator which prevents overfitting of data whereas BIC penalizes the model more based on the number of parameters. While comparing the AIC and BIC, lower scores are preferred and both information criteria are used for appropriate model selection, and it can also be used for distribution selection [39]. The Negative Binomial (NB) distribution for a discrete random variable (X) can be calculated based on Equation (2) [40]:…”
Section: Data Driven Analysis For Quantitative Data: Risk Profile Ana...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BIC is preferred over the AIC when the sample size is much larger than number of parameters. 4) There are no clear guidelines for selecting the most appropriate statistical approaches of GOF test. 3) US EPA recommended decisions of the distribution function depending on the number of data point, the outcome of interest, and the tail of distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8) Little research has been conducted on whether GOF test methods accurately recover the original input parameters. Nonetheless, Chiew et al 4) created mathematically ideal random distributions and compared the distributions derived from several GOF test methods. They found that the performance of statistical methods varied depending on the data characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%