2013
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2013.783060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Disturbed and Undisturbed Soil Core Methods to Estimate Nitrogen-Mineralization Rates in Manured Agricultural Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We studied N mineralization using the resin-tube technique with disturbed soil due to the high stoniness in our plots. As in other studies [60], our values are higher than those of the undisturbed soil. Due to the aeration of the samples and the breakage of soil aggregates, the values obtained in this study are closer to the potential mineralization rates, i.e., those obtained under ideal laboratory conditions, than the net mineralization rate under real conditions [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We studied N mineralization using the resin-tube technique with disturbed soil due to the high stoniness in our plots. As in other studies [60], our values are higher than those of the undisturbed soil. Due to the aeration of the samples and the breakage of soil aggregates, the values obtained in this study are closer to the potential mineralization rates, i.e., those obtained under ideal laboratory conditions, than the net mineralization rate under real conditions [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The laboratory incubation method, which included a sieving pretreatment, could overestimate the net soil N mineralization in no tillage compared to the in situ resin‐core method. Moberg et al () also reported that disturbed cores tended to have more N mineralized than undisturbed cores. This is precisely because no tillage can preserve more SOM than conventional tillage and most of the soil organic C and N is reserved within aggregates under natural field conditions ( Six et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is partly surprising, as comparisons of homogenized and unhomogenized soil have previously shown higher elemental turnover rates when soils are well‐mixed (e.g. Moberg et al, ). An important exception in our review is leaching losses that are consistently underestimated in mesocosm studies (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, we distinguished between studies with intact soils studied in the field and studies with soils from forest ecosystems that had been sampled, pretreated and studied in laboratory conditions (meso/microcosm experiments), as the associated soil disturbance/homogenization may drastically have changed abiotic and biotic characteristics (e.g. Moberg, Johnson, & Sullivan, ; Mohawesh, Janssen, Maaitah, & Lennartz, ), and may have influenced soil process rates even more than transformations of substrates due to herbivory (Andriuzzi & Wall, ). Mesocosm studies with young or no vegetation could potentially bias the results compared to field studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%