2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DMF and UF pre-treatments for particulate material and dissolved organic matter removal in SWRO desalination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to surface-water treatment, the low solids content in these applications allows the low-pressure membranes to be operated in the dead-end filtration mode with intermittent backwashing. The main advantages of membrane filtration compared to conventional pretreatments such as coagulation, flocculation, and sand filtration are improved water quality, smaller footprint, less chemical requirements, and consistent quality of the filtrate [38,39,52,53]. Higher energy demand and membrane fouling are the main disadvantages of having a membrane-filtration system for RO pretreatment.…”
Section: Pretreatment For Ro Desalination and Reclamationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to surface-water treatment, the low solids content in these applications allows the low-pressure membranes to be operated in the dead-end filtration mode with intermittent backwashing. The main advantages of membrane filtration compared to conventional pretreatments such as coagulation, flocculation, and sand filtration are improved water quality, smaller footprint, less chemical requirements, and consistent quality of the filtrate [38,39,52,53]. Higher energy demand and membrane fouling are the main disadvantages of having a membrane-filtration system for RO pretreatment.…”
Section: Pretreatment For Ro Desalination and Reclamationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, statistically significant reductions in TCDs were observed for DAF systems compared to systems operating without coagulation, whereas no statistically significant differences were found between systems operating with DAF and those with coagulation. It was likely that the above discrepancies observed in the results of the pMFA were due to: (1) the high variability of reported removal efficiencies of algal cells in DAF systems (i.e., 43-93%) and (2) the scarcity of studies (N = 3) examining algal cell removal in DAF systems [42,47,48]. The high variability in reported algal removal efficiencies from DAF systems results directly from the site specific algal species composition during the evaluation period for each study [12].…”
Section: Contribution Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…An equally important aspect to consider in future study (that was neglected in this study) is the removal of dissolved toxins in DAF systems. Previous studies have indicated considerable biopolymer and humic acid removal in these systems [12,42,48]; therefore, the removal of other soluble organics, such as algal toxins, would greatly improve the accuracy of future pMFA simulations.…”
Section: Contribution Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations