2016
DOI: 10.9721/kjfst.2016.48.4.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DNA isolation methods for detection of foodborne pathogens by real-time PCR from foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salmonella was initially screened by biochemical assays, namely indole, sugar fermentation assay, production of urease and H 2 S, and production of lysine and ornithine decarboxylase. Genomic DNA of Salmonella species was extracted by the boiling method described by Coo et al [ 26 ] to be used as template DNA for PCR. The isolates were identified as Salmonella by PCR detection of the specific gene inv A, as previously described [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salmonella was initially screened by biochemical assays, namely indole, sugar fermentation assay, production of urease and H 2 S, and production of lysine and ornithine decarboxylase. Genomic DNA of Salmonella species was extracted by the boiling method described by Coo et al [ 26 ] to be used as template DNA for PCR. The isolates were identified as Salmonella by PCR detection of the specific gene inv A, as previously described [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is a strong industrial demand to comply with legislation and Evaluation of a rapid detection method of Salmonella in comparison with the culture method and microbiological quality in fish from the Brazilian Amazon the rapid release of food products to the market. Recent advances in technologies for the detection and identification of contaminated foodborne pathogens have provided faster, more sensitive and specific alternatives to conventional methods (Paula, et al 2002;Kawasaki, et al, 2009;Koo, et al, 2016;Suo, et al, 2017) These assays are generally referred as "fast" or alternative methods, terms commonly used to describe a variety of assays including miniaturized biochemical kits, immunoassays, DNA/ RNA-based assays, and combinations with cultural methods (Lofstrom et al, 2010;Almeida et al, 2013;Kim, et al, 2017). Molecular testing uses a specific sequence of bacterial nucleic acids as a target for pathogen detection and this is the category of alternative methods that most improved in recent years (Valderrama et al, 2016;Hu, et al, 2018;Bundidamorn, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%