2019
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of drugs facilitating endoscopy for patients with acute variceal bleeding: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: We aimed to compare the efficacy of different drugs facilitating endoscopy in patients with acute variceal bleeding.Methods: Databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials which compared the efficacy of vasoactive drugs (vasopressin, terlipressin, octreotide, somatostatin) with placebo or each other. The primary outcomes were 6-week and 5-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 5-day rebleeding, control of initial bleeding and adverse events. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corley et al [36] reported a 47% lower risk of complications with Octreotide than Terlipressin or Vasopressin, and a 69% lower risk of presenting major complications. Zou et al [40] also found Somatostatin and Octreotide had fewer adverse events and non-serious adverse events than V and T. Our findings were consistent with most primary studies that reported adverse events. Furthermore, these findings remained the same despite the different doses of vasoactive agents.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corley et al [36] reported a 47% lower risk of complications with Octreotide than Terlipressin or Vasopressin, and a 69% lower risk of presenting major complications. Zou et al [40] also found Somatostatin and Octreotide had fewer adverse events and non-serious adverse events than V and T. Our findings were consistent with most primary studies that reported adverse events. Furthermore, these findings remained the same despite the different doses of vasoactive agents.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous SRs [6,11,[35][36][37] have compared the efficacy of vasoactive agents with placebo, other vasoactive agents, or other non-pharmacological therapy. Few SRs have attempted to directly compare vasoactive agents used in AVB [10,38], and others have compared different therapies for AVB by network meta-analysis [39][40][41]. However, many of these SRs are outdated, did not include RCTs from Asia, only evaluated the efficacy and non-safety outcomes, did not adequately assess risk of bias or methodological quality, and finally, did not pool all the studies and only presented by subgroups assuming that certain characteristics influence outcomes [11,37].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the microcirculation of the bladder, he used the original technique of intravesical high-frequency Doppler ultrasound. e intensity of pain syndrome and voiding disturbance were assessed using the PUF questionnaire, and psychoemotional status was assessed using the A.T. Depression Scale [10]. However, their research only focused on the specific efficacy of vasoactive drugs for a certain disease and did not analyze the general mechanism of action for cardiovascular diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For portal pressure reduction, various drugs such as vasopressin, nitroglycerin, terlipressin, somatostatin, octreotide, nadolol, or propranolol are useful 29,81 . Carvedilol, a potent nonselective beta‐blocker with mild anti‐alpha 1 adrenergic activity, have shown promising results in the management of portal hypertension.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For portal pressure reduction, various drugs such as vasopressin, nitroglycerin, terlipressin, somatostatin, octreotide, nadolol, or propranolol are useful. 29,81 Carvedilol, a potent nonselective turn causes vasodilation. 82 Carvedilol was associated with a significantly greater decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient than those induced by propranolol or nadolol (a mean difference of 7-9% of reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient), and there were no major differences in the side-effects apart from a slightly greater decrease in the arterial blood pressure caused by carvedilol.…”
Section: ) Pharmacotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%