2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dual-Syringe and Syringeless Power Injectors in Outpatient MDCT Practice: Impact on the Operator's Performance, CT Workflow, and Operation Cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patient number was not large enough to establish the long-term performance of the syringeless device, its robustness in a busy CECT practice, and any risk associated with its continued use. However, compared to similar research work,6 we enrolled a higher number of patients (2,379 compared to 275), which allows us to consolidate and confirm the favorable results of the syringeless PI with a larger sample 6. Another important limitation is the fact that the study was carried out in a single hospital; the results of our study may be, for instance, applied to other hospital settings in the regional/national area, to define and compare mean standard operation costs for CECT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The patient number was not large enough to establish the long-term performance of the syringeless device, its robustness in a busy CECT practice, and any risk associated with its continued use. However, compared to similar research work,6 we enrolled a higher number of patients (2,379 compared to 275), which allows us to consolidate and confirm the favorable results of the syringeless PI with a larger sample 6. Another important limitation is the fact that the study was carried out in a single hospital; the results of our study may be, for instance, applied to other hospital settings in the regional/national area, to define and compare mean standard operation costs for CECT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The syringeless device allows the upload of two bottles of contrast medium, up to 500 mL; a bag of saline can be uploaded separately, and a disposable sterile connecting system of the various flows is available for each patient. The dual syringe device can load two syringes containing up to 200 mL of contrast medium and saline 6. At the end of the day, a RT recorded any wastage of contrast medium incurred for each system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of contrast media that is drawn up but not utilized represents a tremendous opportunity to achieve cost savings. One study looking prospectively at consecutive contrast enhanced CT exams documented 11 mL of contrast media waste per exam, for example [4]. Another group was able to realize cost savings by using decreased volume of contrast media used by administering a higher concentration of contrast.…”
Section: Decreased Dosing and Costmentioning
confidence: 99%