2001
DOI: 10.1093/bja/86.1.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients

Abstract: In a randomized double-blind study, we compared the effect of remifentanil and alfentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients on long-term treatment for hypertension. Forty ASA II-III patients were allocated to receive (i) remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of 0.1 microg kg min(-1) or (ii) alfentanil 10 microg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of saline; all patients received glycopyrrolate 200 microg before the study drug. Anaesthesia was induced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of interventions [1][2][3][4][5][6] have been examined as possible stabilisers of the cardiovascular response, but none of these interventions have resulted in stable induction of anaesthesia because of either the inadequacy of their effect or unwanted sideeffects. It would be of great help if we could predict the haemodynamic response to induction of general anaesthesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of interventions [1][2][3][4][5][6] have been examined as possible stabilisers of the cardiovascular response, but none of these interventions have resulted in stable induction of anaesthesia because of either the inadequacy of their effect or unwanted sideeffects. It would be of great help if we could predict the haemodynamic response to induction of general anaesthesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most reports concerning the pressure response to tracheal intubation in the presence of remifentanil used a bolus dose of propofol [8][9][10][11][12][13] or bolus followed by continuous infusion of remifentanil [14][15][16]. Miyake and colleagues demonstrated that continuous administration of remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg/min with midazolam 0.2 mg/kg suppressed the pressure responses to tracheal intubation compared with remifentanil 0.1 and 0.2 μg/kg/min [17] There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure between continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg/min following a bolus dose of remifentanil 1 μg/kg and 0.25 μg/kg/min following a bolus dose of 0.5 μg/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…predicted concentration around 3 ng/ml) already induced hypotension in 7/20 hypertensive patients (Maguire et al 2001).…”
Section: Induction and Airway Controlmentioning
confidence: 91%