2016
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15027001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of EGFR mutation rates in lung adenocarcinoma tissue and pleural effusion samples

Abstract: ABSTRACT.The goal of the current study was to investigate the differences in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation rates in tumor tissue and pleural effusion specimens from patients with lung adenocarcinoma. PCR amplification and gene sequencing were used to detect EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 in tumor tissue and pleural effusion samples from 50 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The EGFR mutation rate was 34.0% in tissue samples from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monaco et al 21 reported that EGFR status of primary lung carcinomas might not predict the status in the corresponding metastases. By contrast, Guan et al found that while tissue samples had a slightly higher mutation rate compared to pleural effusion samples, the difference was not statistically significant. Our results showed that the detection of the mutant EGFR in cell sediment and supernatant ccfDNA were 51.1% (23/45) and 44.4% (20/45), indicating that these two materials show often a discordance in EGFR mutation analysis (Tables and ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Monaco et al 21 reported that EGFR status of primary lung carcinomas might not predict the status in the corresponding metastases. By contrast, Guan et al found that while tissue samples had a slightly higher mutation rate compared to pleural effusion samples, the difference was not statistically significant. Our results showed that the detection of the mutant EGFR in cell sediment and supernatant ccfDNA were 51.1% (23/45) and 44.4% (20/45), indicating that these two materials show often a discordance in EGFR mutation analysis (Tables and ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…MPE could be used to detect the presence of EGFR mutations, especially when there is not enough tissue available for mutational analysis. The results of the main studies assessing the feasibility of detection of EGFR mutations in MPE are summarized in Table …”
Section: Implications Of New Therapies In Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the main studies assessing the feasibility of detection of EGFR mutations in MPE are summarized in Table 1. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The quality of the MPE samples is essential to improve quantity and quality of tumour cells for mutational analysis. After enrichment of pleural fluid, 27 the percentage of the tumour cells in MPE was increased from 0.64% to 40.8%.…”
Section: Egfr Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility of soluble protein-based biomarkers has been studied for many years in MPE, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15 and 22%, respectively. The combination of these markers resulted in a sensitivity of 54%.…”
Section: Molecular Testing For Malignant Pleural Effusion Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%