2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.08.937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Electrical and Ultrasound Neurostimulation in Rat Motor Cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas bubble formation and explosion was proposed to be a possible mechanism [46] while other studies suggested gas bubbles may not be a major cause [47]. A recent study by Gulick et al [48] demonstrated that the effect of ultrasound stimulation on the rat motor cortex was completely different from that by electrical stimulation, and they suggested this could be a microbubble-related effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas bubble formation and explosion was proposed to be a possible mechanism [46] while other studies suggested gas bubbles may not be a major cause [47]. A recent study by Gulick et al [48] demonstrated that the effect of ultrasound stimulation on the rat motor cortex was completely different from that by electrical stimulation, and they suggested this could be a microbubble-related effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to prior reports of M1 TUS in humans (Gibson et al, 2018;Legon et al, 2018b), we were unable to evoke motor potentials or EMG activities by application of TUS alone to the motor cortex. Interestingly, studies in small rodents consistently show EMG activity and frank motor contractions of hindlimbs (Gulick et al, 2017), whiskers (Mehić et al, 2014), and tail (Yoo et al, 2013) contralateral to the sonicated motor cortex, as well as inducing eye movements and pupillary dilatation (Kamimura et al, 2016). Although the majority of these studies were done under complete or partial anesthesia, recent studies with awake, freely moving rats have also found that TUS alone can also trigger truncal and limb movements (Lee et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we present three potential interpretations for how the brain responds to ultrasound energy deposition (Figure 1). Given the extensive electrophysiological [20,21,30,32], neurovascular [24,29,34,41], motor [14,1618,22,23] and cognitive [32,35,36] evidences in support of tFUS-induced direct neural effects, we further examine whether the auditory pathway in the small brain volumes of rodent or mouse models dictates or impacts the observed activation patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%