2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00840-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of electrocardiographic-gated technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging and rest-redistribution thallium-201 in the prediction of myocardial viability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…54 In studies that evaluated the improvement of function on a segmental basis (Table 2), SPECT and PET demonstrate excellent sensitivity, whereas echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance with dobutamine stress have superior specificity and positive predictive value. 22,66,67,70,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] In a preliminary study in a small group of patients, late-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in direct comparison with 99m Tc-sestamibi and FDG-PET showed better negative predictive value for segments classified as nonviable 6 months after revascularization. 67 In interpreting these results, we must consider several potential confounding factors.…”
Section: Camici Et Al Stunning Hibernation and Assessment Of Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…54 In studies that evaluated the improvement of function on a segmental basis (Table 2), SPECT and PET demonstrate excellent sensitivity, whereas echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance with dobutamine stress have superior specificity and positive predictive value. 22,66,67,70,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] In a preliminary study in a small group of patients, late-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in direct comparison with 99m Tc-sestamibi and FDG-PET showed better negative predictive value for segments classified as nonviable 6 months after revascularization. 67 In interpreting these results, we must consider several potential confounding factors.…”
Section: Camici Et Al Stunning Hibernation and Assessment Of Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As in many other studies using functional recovery as the reference standard to define myocardial viability, the patient population is quite small. 9,11,12 A limitation of gated SPECT compared with echocardiography is the impossibility to monitor changes during dobutamine infusion, and so to differentiate between lack of improvement and biphasic response, which is considered the most reliable marker of preserved viability in dobutamine echocardiography. 26,27 Conversely, we did not perform a quantitative analysis of wall motion and thickening on gated SPECT images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further improve viability assessment with the 99m Tclabeled agents, two modifications of the protocol have been proposed: gated imaging and administration of nitrates prior to imaging. Two studies demonstrated the improvement in accuracy for the assessment of viability when gated imaging was used [28,29].…”
Section: M Tc -Labeled Tracers To Assess Perfusion and Intactness Omentioning
confidence: 99%