2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of endoscopic treatment modalities for Barrett’s neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies were published between 2007 and 2015 (two studies identified as abstracts were accepted as manuscripts in 2015). 42,45 In most studies (73%, n ¼ 27), the treatment protocol included EMR in addition to RFA, which was usually performed in a separate endoscopic session. In 77% (n ¼ 28), a combination of RFA devices (focal and circumferential) was used in the treatment protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All studies were published between 2007 and 2015 (two studies identified as abstracts were accepted as manuscripts in 2015). 42,45 In most studies (73%, n ¼ 27), the treatment protocol included EMR in addition to RFA, which was usually performed in a separate endoscopic session. In 77% (n ¼ 28), a combination of RFA devices (focal and circumferential) was used in the treatment protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stricture formation accounted for the majority of reported adverse events at a pooled rate of 5.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-7.4%), P < .001, I 2 ¼ 78%. Perforations were reported in 4 studies, 14,21,29,30 totaling 5 patients (Table 1). Of those 5 cases, 2 perforations 14,30 were related to EMR, not RFA.…”
Section: Secondary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large cohort retrospective study showed that Photofrin ® -PDT was more effective in achieving a complete response in HGD and ADC patients compared to other modalities. However, the morbidities related to Photofrin ® and the additional financial investment needed for PDT, drive clinicians to use other modalities such as RFA and EMR [ 163 ]. Recognizing the potential of PDT, it remains an active topic of research.…”
Section: Pdt In Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same group later published longterm follow up of their data and demonstrated that the rate of CE-HGD was maintained at 5 year follow-up (61). A newer retrospective observational study published in 2016 from a single center evaluating PDT vs. RFA + EMR vs. RFA alone in the treatment of BE showed a higher rate of CE-IM at 1 year for the PDT group (71.9%) compared to the RFA + EMR group (47.8%) and the RFA group (22.9%) (62). The main treatment-related adverse events of PDT in the esophagus include skin photosensitivity and esophageal stricture formation.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapy (Pdt)mentioning
confidence: 95%