2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of energy efficiency and economics of process designs for biobutanol production from sugarcane molasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assumed that RBE would be produced chemically using the same equipment and, after minor modifications and additions, the same equipment would also be used for the production of RBE by applying the biotechnological method. Considering that butanol, in contrast to synthetic methanol, is obtained by biotechnological methods, its energy contribution was calculated according to the value of the life cycle energy efficiency indicator of butanol, 1.88, and the calorific value of butanol [14].…”
Section: Biodiesel Ner Calculation and Comparison With Fossil Dieselmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that RBE would be produced chemically using the same equipment and, after minor modifications and additions, the same equipment would also be used for the production of RBE by applying the biotechnological method. Considering that butanol, in contrast to synthetic methanol, is obtained by biotechnological methods, its energy contribution was calculated according to the value of the life cycle energy efficiency indicator of butanol, 1.88, and the calorific value of butanol [14].…”
Section: Biodiesel Ner Calculation and Comparison With Fossil Dieselmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is not possible to assert that the cellulosic residues will be cheaper than molasses. Van der Merwe et al [64] reported analyses of the energy efficiency and economics of biobutanol production using sugarcane molasses. Another important point to be analyzed related to the choice of substrate and its availability throughout the year.…”
Section: Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, pervaporation (a membrane-based separation technique) may reduce production costs, especially if combined with the fermenter as a hybrid process [6,71,72]. Recently, conceptual designs of alternative process routes for biobutanol production from sugarcane molasses were done using Aspen Plus and Aspen Icarus modeling tools [73]. Different fermentation modes (batch or fed-batch), bacterium strains (Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC824 or PCSIR-10, Clostridium beijerinckii BA101) and downstream processing techniques (steam stripping distillation, liquid-liquid extraction or gas stripping with CO 2 ) were investigated.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Feedstocks and Unit Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%