2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of environmental and acoustic factors in occupied school classrooms for 11–16 year old students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Ramasoot and Fotios (2008), also indicated in their study that the widespread use of smart boards probably lowered the requirement of illuminance level for demanding tasks on self--luminous display screens. Similar conclusions were drawn by Mydlarz et al (2013), who also found lighting levels were predominantly below the recommended levels in their classrooms study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Ramasoot and Fotios (2008), also indicated in their study that the widespread use of smart boards probably lowered the requirement of illuminance level for demanding tasks on self--luminous display screens. Similar conclusions were drawn by Mydlarz et al (2013), who also found lighting levels were predominantly below the recommended levels in their classrooms study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, whilst no measurement showed overheating problems, the interviews with teachers indicated that their temperature sensation of comfort was lower than the environmental recommendations (DfES, 2003a). The overall CO 2 level was lower than previous studies (Clements --Croome et al, 2008;Mydlarz et al, 2013) though all of the measurements were carried out in UK primary schools. Large variations and high concentrations in CO 2 levels can be seen as a common problem in school classrooms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The EN Standard 1264-1 establishes the fundamental rules for artificial lighting in indoor work places and tackles the glare issues, encouraging the integration between natural and artificial lighting [11]. A recent investigation conducted in the UK, found that light levels are predominantly below recommended levels for demanding tasks (either 300 lx for regular class activities or 500 lx for detailed drawing activities) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study has comprised questionnaire surveys of students and teachers, 34 cognitive testing of students in different levels of noise, noise and acoustic surveys of many spaces typical of secondary schools, plus monitoring of environmental conditions in classrooms. 35 This paper presents the results of noise and acoustic surveys of unoccupied and occupied spaces in 13 secondary schools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%