2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-020-00675-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Experimental Measurements of Material Grain Size Using Ultrasound

Abstract: Material grain size is related to metallic material properties and its elastic behaviour. Measuring and monitoring material grain size in material manufacturing and service is an important topic in measurement field. In this paper, three materials, i.e., aluminium 2014 T6, steel BS970 and copper EN1652, were chosen to represent materials with small, medium and large grain size, respectively. Various techniques of measuring material grain size were demonstrated and compared. These techniques include the measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the magnitudes of C 11 and C 12 are significantly lower for 1Ce:YAG, its longitudinal component of sound velocity (V 11 ) is largely preserved, whereas the transverse component of sound velocity (V 44 ) is significantly reduced (Table 2). V 44 is more sensitive to microstructural variations than V 11 , 54,55 thus a reduction in V 44 may again reflect the presence of micropores and anisotropic grain size distributions in 1Ce:YAG 56‐58 . This is consistent with lower magnitudes in the elastic moduli of 1Ce:YAG compared to 0.025Ce:YAG and 0.1Ce:YAG (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the magnitudes of C 11 and C 12 are significantly lower for 1Ce:YAG, its longitudinal component of sound velocity (V 11 ) is largely preserved, whereas the transverse component of sound velocity (V 44 ) is significantly reduced (Table 2). V 44 is more sensitive to microstructural variations than V 11 , 54,55 thus a reduction in V 44 may again reflect the presence of micropores and anisotropic grain size distributions in 1Ce:YAG 56‐58 . This is consistent with lower magnitudes in the elastic moduli of 1Ce:YAG compared to 0.025Ce:YAG and 0.1Ce:YAG (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The elastic moduli of 1Ce:YAG differ 2). V 44 is more sensitive to microstructural variations than V 11 , 54,55 thus a reduction in V 44 may again reflect the presence of micropores and anisotropic grain size distributions in 1Ce:YAG. [56][57][58] This is consistent with lower magnitudes in the elastic moduli of 1Ce:YAG compared to 0.025Ce:YAG and 0.1Ce:YAG (Table 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2-D linear systems modelling approach [ 21 , 24 ] is used to simulate the FMC data set from a defect and hence produce noise-free images for comparison purposes. In the frequency domain, for a wave path from transmitter element at to a defect at and back to a receiver element at , the received signal can be expressed as [ 21 , 24 ], where, is the signal spectrum of the transmitted signal, B is the directivity function of an array element [ 25 ], is the measured material attenuation coefficient as shown in Figure 3 [ 26 ], is the scattering matrix [ 27 ] of the defect at the wave incident angle of and scattering angle of .…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, a small piece of specimen is taken from material and polished for microstructure imaging with optical and electron microscopy [ 3 ]. Though this method provides extensive and accurate details, it is constrained by their destructive nature, as well as laboratory confinement and time-consuming procedures for specimen preparation [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%