2008
DOI: 10.1080/10826070802000699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Extraction and HPLC Methods for Marine Sedimentary Chloropigment Determinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extraction method is used in our Marine Pollution Laboratory (MPL-IO) for chloropigments and has been intercalibrated with other traditional methods of pigment extraction. 9 Acetone has been shown to be an effective extraction solvent for wet sediment samples. 30 In many methods a small volume of solvent was used (up to 10 ml), after which the extract was analysed by HPLC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This extraction method is used in our Marine Pollution Laboratory (MPL-IO) for chloropigments and has been intercalibrated with other traditional methods of pigment extraction. 9 Acetone has been shown to be an effective extraction solvent for wet sediment samples. 30 In many methods a small volume of solvent was used (up to 10 ml), after which the extract was analysed by HPLC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] The extraction efficiency depends on the type of solvent, its volume and time of extraction. 4,[7][8][9][10] Pigments are extracted with different solvents, i.e. acetone, methanol, ethanol or their mixtures (see Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations