2016
DOI: 10.1515/acgeo-2015-0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Factorial Kriging Analysis Method and Upward Continuation Filter to Recognize Subsurface Structures — A Case Study: Gravity Data from a Hydrocarbon Field in the Southeast Sedimentary Basins of the East Vietnam Sea

Abstract: To interpret geophysical anomaly maps, it is necessary to filter out regional and sometimes noise components. Each measured value in a gravity survey consists of different components. Upward continuation (UC) is one of the most widely used filters. The shortcoming of this filter is not to consider the spatial structure of the data, and also the fact that the trial and error approach and expert's judgment are needed to adjust it. This study aims to compare the factorial kriging analysis (FKA) and UC filters for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to enhance the signatures of mafic materials into the upper crust, observed data are separated into regional and residual anomalies [38] using polynomial fitting based on the least-squares method. In order to choose the order of the regional field which fixes the resi-dual one, this method which is the most flexible and efficient analytical technique [39] [40] is combined with optimum upward continuation method [38] to determine the best surface representing regional field. The selection criterion of the regional field is the more objective, as it is based on the correlation between the regional analytical and the regional spectral.…”
Section: Methods For Estimating the Optimum Upward-continuation Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to enhance the signatures of mafic materials into the upper crust, observed data are separated into regional and residual anomalies [38] using polynomial fitting based on the least-squares method. In order to choose the order of the regional field which fixes the resi-dual one, this method which is the most flexible and efficient analytical technique [39] [40] is combined with optimum upward continuation method [38] to determine the best surface representing regional field. The selection criterion of the regional field is the more objective, as it is based on the correlation between the regional analytical and the regional spectral.…”
Section: Methods For Estimating the Optimum Upward-continuation Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%