2000
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200003000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of FDG-PET with MIBI-SPECT in the Detection of Breast Cancer and Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis

Abstract: These results indicate that MIBI-SPECT is comparable with FDG-PET in detecting breast cancer. Neither FDG-PET nor MIBI-SPECT is sufficiently sensitive to rule out axillary lymph node metastasis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
36
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable results were found in a study using GCPET to detect primary lesions in 26 women with a sensitivity of 84.6% (24). However, in the same study, GCPET detected axillary lymph node metastases with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100% (24).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparable results were found in a study using GCPET to detect primary lesions in 26 women with a sensitivity of 84.6% (24). However, in the same study, GCPET detected axillary lymph node metastases with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100% (24).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Previously, we successfully reported the use of GCPET in the detection of primary breast tumours with a superior sensitivity, compared with mammography and ultrosonography (23). Comparable results were found in a study using GCPET to detect primary lesions in 26 women with a sensitivity of 84.6% (24). However, in the same study, GCPET detected axillary lymph node metastases with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100% (24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Nine studies recruited patients both prospectively and consecutively. 85,90,93,94,96,97,106,107 The number of analysed patients (relevant to this review) ranged from 24 to 308. Fourteen studies presented data such that the patients analysed in this review were entirely early stage (stage I, II or IIIA), newly diagnosed and non-DCIS, 44,75,76,80,[83][84][85][86][87][88][89]92,94,97 while the remaining 12 studies comprised up to 20% of patients who did not meet these criteria.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common clinical practice in patients with breast cancer to carry out ultrasound of the axilla together with fine needle aspiration cytology of any suspicious axillary nodes that are identified (or palpable) prior to patients undergoing SNB [10]. Similarly MRI [11,32], CT [33,34], mammography [7,11] and other non-PET radionuclides (MIBI) [25] have all been suggested as useful in the staging of the axilla. It would not be the aim to perform a complete review of all modalities at this stage, since an extensive number of studies have not been carried out in all modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%