2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fixed and mobile in-pit crushing and conveying and truck-shovel systems used in mineral industries through discrete-event simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bernardi et al (2020) used an ARENA simulation model to compare semi-mobile and fixed IPCC systems for open pit mines in terms of NPV and proximity to the target production rate. The simulation was run for a simplified cone-shaped hypothetical mine with hourly costs, and results showed that SMIPCC generated 10% higher NPV and was closer to production targets.…”
Section: Ipcc Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bernardi et al (2020) used an ARENA simulation model to compare semi-mobile and fixed IPCC systems for open pit mines in terms of NPV and proximity to the target production rate. The simulation was run for a simplified cone-shaped hypothetical mine with hourly costs, and results showed that SMIPCC generated 10% higher NPV and was closer to production targets.…”
Section: Ipcc Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from a copper mine show that while the CAPEX of SMIPCC is 60% higher than TS, the OPEX is 43% lower because of low maintenance and labour cost, which results in a 34% saving in net present cost over a LOM of 20 years. Bernardi et al (2020) used an ARENA simulation model to compare semi-mobile and fixed IPCC systems for open pit mines in terms of NPV and proximity to the target production rate. The simulation was run for a simplified cone-shaped hypothetical mine with hourly costs, and results showed that SMIPCC generated 10% higher NPV and was closer to production targets.…”
Section: Economic Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is used as the basis to develop a methodology for calculating optimal arrangement of the IPCC technology and the time for transfer. Paper [7] studied configuration of a mine field geometry and models discrete events in the IPCC system to evaluate the possibility of its application and identification of drawbacks. Study [8] compares cyclic and IPCC technologies of iron ore mining and transportation by analyzing the costs of previous feasibility study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, semi-mobile IPCC systems have different strategic mine planning and sequence requirements than the truck-and-shovel counterpart; the crusher and conveyor cannot be relocated frequently due to the high relocation costs [8]. Moreover, the massive initial investment associated with IPCC systems forces the mine planners to design the mining strategy precisely in the long run, especially in large-scale mines [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%