2019
DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2019.1627044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of forest canopy height profiles in a mountainous region of Taiwan derived from airborne lidar and unmanned aerial vehicle imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used equation 2 to estimate tree height of sparse broadleaf trees in the litterfall plots. The protocol used for tree height measurements can be found in Chung et al (2019). We then derived the statistics of the plot scale tree height (mean, SD , CV , maximum, and range) using the measured DBH at the 15 litterfall plots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used equation 2 to estimate tree height of sparse broadleaf trees in the litterfall plots. The protocol used for tree height measurements can be found in Chung et al (2019). We then derived the statistics of the plot scale tree height (mean, SD , CV , maximum, and range) using the measured DBH at the 15 litterfall plots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The base airborne lidar digital elevation model (DEM) data (the altitude of the land surface above sea level excluding aboveground objects such as trees) for the entire study region from 2012 to 2015 was obtained through a national scale geological inventory project conducted by the Taiwan Central Geological Survey (see Lai et al, 2021 for the sensor specifications). Lidar point density was +1.5 points m −2 , and these point cloud data were gridded into a 1‐meter resolution DEM using adaptive kriging (SCOP++, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Vienna, Austria) (Chung et al, 2019). The vertical accuracy of the DEM was ≤22.5 cm, which was determined by comparisons with measurements from a high‐precision global positioning system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) and some previous literature (Hsu, Horng & Kuo, 2002;Köhler et al, 2007;Chen, Liu & Wang, 2010), we found that there may be a significant relationship between tree size and the abundance of EB (Gómez González et al, 2017). With the availability of a three-dimensional tree size spatial layer at the regional scale derived from high spatial resolution airborne lidar (light detection and ranging) or aerial photographic point cloud data (Chung et al, 2019;Kellner et al, 2019), we may be able to map wall-to-wall EB biomass over a vast region. This also answers the second part of our third research question (Q 3 ) as to the potential of the proposed EB biomass measuring approach for the regional scale spatial assessment.…”
Section: Limitation and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Although the cost of UAV digital images is low, the accuracy and quality of the acquired point clouds are easily affected by weather conditions [31,32]. Compared with optical sensors, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is an active remote sensing tool that can obtain the three-dimensional coordinate information of the target, and can provide vegetation height and vertical structure information [33,34]. In addition, it is not affected by light conditions [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%