2014
DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four lung scoring systems for the assessment of the pathological outcomes derived from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae experimental infections

Abstract: BackgroundIn this study, four lung lesion scoring methods (Slaughterhouse Pleurisy Evaluation System [SPES], Consolidation Lung Lesion Score [LLS], Image analyses [IA] and Ratio of lung weight/body weight [LW/BW]) were compared for the assessment of the different pathological outcomes derived from an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App) experimental infection model. Moreover, pathological data was coupled with clinical (fever, inappetence and clinical score), production (average daily weigh gain [ADWG]) and d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bacterial loads in the lungs were measured and identified at 10 dpi as described above. The clinical score of lung was performed with the consolidation lung lesion score (LLS) (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacterial loads in the lungs were measured and identified at 10 dpi as described above. The clinical score of lung was performed with the consolidation lung lesion score (LLS) (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical score criteria refer to previous reports (Sibila, Aragón, Fraile, & Segalés, ). Clinical score = (Respiratory score + Rectal temperature)/2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paraffin-embedded blocks were cut into 5 μm-thick sections. For morphometric lesion and inflammation analyses, the lung sections were stained with H&E and examined in a blinded manner to assess the necrotic lesions as previously described (85). A semiquantitative analysis was performed using a score from 0 (no inflammation) to 4 (severe inflammation) for each of the following criteria: alveolar wall inflammation, alveoli destruction, leukocyte infiltration, and perivascular inflammation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%