2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fully non-stationary artificial accelerogram generation methods in reproducing seismicity at a given site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better show the energy variation of the ground motion in each group, the Husid function [57] of all the motions in three groups and two scenarios are evaluated. The Husid function, which is equivalent to the normalized build up of Arias intensity, can be used to constrain the temporal nonstationarity of acceleration time history over time duration [36,43]. For instance, the strong-motion duration can be defined as the time during 0.05 ≤ ( ) ≤ 0.95 [28].…”
Section: Nonstationarities Of Spectrum-compatible Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To better show the energy variation of the ground motion in each group, the Husid function [57] of all the motions in three groups and two scenarios are evaluated. The Husid function, which is equivalent to the normalized build up of Arias intensity, can be used to constrain the temporal nonstationarity of acceleration time history over time duration [36,43]. For instance, the strong-motion duration can be defined as the time during 0.05 ≤ ( ) ≤ 0.95 [28].…”
Section: Nonstationarities Of Spectrum-compatible Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For single-degree-of-freedom systems, Iervolino et al [ 11] show some artificial ground-motion models produce biased engineering demand parameters (EDPs); Tsioulou et al [40,41] developed modification methods for a stochastic ground-motion model that can produce similar EDP distribution with that produced by records [42]. While, for multiple-degree-of-freedom systems, stochastic models that can faithfully reproduce the hysteretic energy dissipated by structures compared with records are still unavailable [43]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a stochastic model that can well control the nonstationary features of ground motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e spectrumcompatibility criterion selected in this paper refers to related research [29][30][31][32], and when selecting ground motion, the three factors of amplitude, spectrum characteristics, and duration should be considered comprehensively. e details are as follows.…”
Section: Selected Ground Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Baadani and Al-Shameri [58] investigated several IMs for evaluation of the seismic response of RC frame minarets and concluded that the optimal IM for these structures is S A (T 1 , 2T 1 ) which defines as the geometric mean of the spectral accelerations at T 1 and 2T 1 . Colajanni et al [59] carried out a correlation study between interstory drift ratios and three different intensity measure parameters, including PGA, PGV, and S A (T 1 ) in irregular RC structures. e results of their study confirmed that PGV is highly correlated to drift responses, and as a result, it is more efficient than PGA and S A (T 1 ).…”
Section: E Optimal Intensity Measurementioning
confidence: 99%