2017
DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Fused Glass Beads and Pressed Powder Pellets for the Quantitative Measurement of Al, Fe, Si and Ti in Bauxite by Laser‐Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Abstract: Due to matrix interference and sample particle size effects, some of the most important and difficult issues in laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) analysis are the calibration and quantitative measurement of a complex matrix. This study proposes the use of borate fusion as an alternative sample preparation procedure for the quantitative measurement of Al, Fe, Si and Ti in bauxite by LIBS. Analytical calibration curves were made using bauxite certified reference materials (CRM), and the precision and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing powdered carbonate pellet reference materials (e.g., MACS-1, MACS-3, MACS-3NP, JCP-1, and JCt-1) are deemed unsuitable for long-term preservation and use due to their poor physical characteristics, leading to the physical matrix difference compared to natural calcite. 47,48 Conversely, natural calcite crystal reference materials offer a better match in terms of matrixes with real natural samples and exhibit enhanced stability. In in situ Sr isotope analysis, MNP, TLM, and LSJ07 are recently developed reference materials, 37 with 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios of 0.70617 ± 0.00005 (2SD), 0.70969 ± 0.00023 (2SD), and 0.71006 ± 0.00015 (2SD) respectively (Table 3), while MPN calcite with Sr content up to 10 000 mg g −1 may not be well-matched with low-Sr mass-fraction samples.…”
Section: Potential Reference Materials For In Situ Sr Isotope Analysi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing powdered carbonate pellet reference materials (e.g., MACS-1, MACS-3, MACS-3NP, JCP-1, and JCt-1) are deemed unsuitable for long-term preservation and use due to their poor physical characteristics, leading to the physical matrix difference compared to natural calcite. 47,48 Conversely, natural calcite crystal reference materials offer a better match in terms of matrixes with real natural samples and exhibit enhanced stability. In in situ Sr isotope analysis, MNP, TLM, and LSJ07 are recently developed reference materials, 37 with 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios of 0.70617 ± 0.00005 (2SD), 0.70969 ± 0.00023 (2SD), and 0.71006 ± 0.00015 (2SD) respectively (Table 3), while MPN calcite with Sr content up to 10 000 mg g −1 may not be well-matched with low-Sr mass-fraction samples.…”
Section: Potential Reference Materials For In Situ Sr Isotope Analysi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches depend on proper matrix-matching, which was achieved by sample fusion. 18 SRC stands out as the best calibration strategy because only one calibration standard is needed and more accurate results are achieved. 28,30…”
Section: Calibration Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there is a lack of proper calibration standards, synthetic standards may be prepared by spiking increasing amounts of the analytes onto a diluent such as cellulose powder 14 or filter paper 15 in the analysis of plant materials and alginin in the analysis of human nails. 11 In order to compensate for instrumental drifts and instabilities, and sometimes also matrix effects on the plasma, the internal standard (IS) calibration method has been useful, 16 as demonstrated for geological 17,18 and biological 19 samples. The standard addition method (SAM) is not practical for solid sample analysis because of the difficulties in adding proper analyte amounts to the sample and errors may be caused by the heterogeneous distribution of the spiked analytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep HDS requires supports with high surface areas, enhanced pore sizes, higher fraction of mesopores and small macropores, larger pore volumes allowing increased exposure of active sites and better dispersion of active components and their availability to large sulphur molecules. Due to these reasons, the conventionally used γ-alumina (γ-Al2O3) support is a far less efficient option compared to other supports like highly porous silicas, which are increasingly attractive [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Their main advantages for use as catalyst supports are: high surface areas of about 600-1300 m 2 /g and huge pore volumes; uniform topology providing high dispersion of metal nanoparticles and easy access of the reactants to the active sites; excellent mechanical properties and hydrothermal stability for demanding reaction conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%