2019
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea

Abstract: ObjectiveA genome-based best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method was applied to evaluate accuracies of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) of carcass and reproductive traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korean swine breeding farms.MethodsThe data comprised a total of 1,870, 696, and 1,723 genotyped pigs belonging to Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire breeds, respectively. Reference populations for carcass traits consisted of 888 Berkshire, 466 Duroc, and 1,208 Yorkshire pigs, and thos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GBLUP model used in the GS analysis demonstrated a prediction accuracy ranging from 0.154 to 0.190. This was not significantly different from the results of genomic prediction accuracy studies on the carcass weight of the pig [26], the carcass traits of sheep [27], and the one-year weight of Hanwoo beef cattle [28]. The findings of this study were reliable.…”
Section: Animals and Datasupporting
confidence: 45%
“…The GBLUP model used in the GS analysis demonstrated a prediction accuracy ranging from 0.154 to 0.190. This was not significantly different from the results of genomic prediction accuracy studies on the carcass weight of the pig [26], the carcass traits of sheep [27], and the one-year weight of Hanwoo beef cattle [28]. The findings of this study were reliable.…”
Section: Animals and Datasupporting
confidence: 45%
“…An estimate of the correlation of GEBV between traits and ( ) was obtained using the weighted Pearson correlation coefficient of GEBV, as described in [ 43 ]: with and , where and are the GEBV of traits and , respectively, and is the accuracy-based weighting of animal , calculated as . The SE of was derived as where is the number of selected animals that have GEBV accuracies higher than an empirical value of 0.35 [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimates of heritability for meat quality and carcass composition traits for 80% of the traits exhibited larger and more accurate values, that is, lower SE, with either G IBS or G IBD than with A 22 . In previous reports from pure and crossbreed pig populations, the estimates of heritabilities for traits of meat quality and carcass composition were in the range of those obtained by us, either by fitting A 22 (Miar et al, 2014;Van Wijk et al, 2005;Willson et al, 2020), or G IBS (Casiró et al, 2017;Iqbal et al, 2019) or using the single-step covariance matrix H (Khanal et al, 2019), whereas there are no studies employing the G IBD covariance structure. More accurate estimates of heritability can be achieved when dense marker information is available, since it should not be subject to pedigree errors (Hayes & Goddard, 2008).…”
Section: Estimation Of Heritabilitymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In the estimation of σu2 between genomic covariance specifications, the GIBD model showed a slight increment compared to GIBS model for all traits analysed in the current research. Previous studies estimating variance components for meat quality traits in pigs have employed one approach to set up the covariance matrix of BV (i.e., pedigree‐based A , GBLUP G , or Single‐Step H matrices; Iqbal et al, 2019; Khanal et al, 2019; Van Wijk et al, 2005; Willson et al, 2020). Neither research used a GIBD relationship matrix, nor a comparison of models has been done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%