1980
DOI: 10.1029/jb085ib05p02685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of geodetic and radio interferometric measurements of the Haystack‐Westford base line vector

Abstract: A three-dimensional geodetic measurement of the 1.24-km Haystack-Westford base line vector was performed to verify the accuracy of previously published radio interferometric measurements. The differences between the geodetic and the very long base line interferometry (VLBI) measurements of the base line length, the horizontal X and Y components, and the vertical Z component were -4, 2, 4, and -19 mm, respectively. After a correction was applied to the VLBI determination of the vertical component to account for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the precise orbits were used by all GPS ACs, reducing orbit error effect on PWV estimates. VLBI is not sensitive to the PWV estimates with changing elevation angle (Niell et al, 2001), and a limit of less than 0.2 mm of PWV can be set on this type of error due to the motion of the antenna, due either to deformation of the antenna itself, or to changes in electrical path length of the cables with antenna orientation (Carter et al, 1980;Herring, 1992). The mapping function causes a dry bias of less than 1 mm in the PWV estimates (Tregoning et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, the precise orbits were used by all GPS ACs, reducing orbit error effect on PWV estimates. VLBI is not sensitive to the PWV estimates with changing elevation angle (Niell et al, 2001), and a limit of less than 0.2 mm of PWV can be set on this type of error due to the motion of the antenna, due either to deformation of the antenna itself, or to changes in electrical path length of the cables with antenna orientation (Carter et al, 1980;Herring, 1992). The mapping function causes a dry bias of less than 1 mm in the PWV estimates (Tregoning et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most likely cause of such errors is associated with the motion of the antenna, due either to deformation of the antenna itself, or to changes in electrical path length of the cables with antenna orientation. A limit of less than 1 mm of ZWD can be set on this type of error due to the close agreement of the relative positions of the Westford and Haystack antennas (separated by 1.4 km) determined by VLBI and by conventional geodesy (Carter et al 1980;).…”
Section: E Vlbimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, investigations are needed to verify the possible hysteresis of the focal length variations. Furthermore, the Onsala Space Observatory is in the possibility of having the SPV variation model externally validated by comparing the baseline derived by high-precision terrestrial observations and the baseline obtained by the VLBI data analysis (e.g., Carter et al 1980). For this purpose, terrestrial measurement campaigns are planed to derive the local base-line vectors between the hosted space geodetic techniques at Onsala.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%