2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hardness and polishability of various occlusal splint materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An adequate wetting aspect of the denture bases and occlusal devices is important as it has various surface energies that have distinct wettability properties. 34 One study 35 investigated the hardness of the heat-cured and CAD/CAM materials in dry and wet conditions where specimens were stored in water for 30 days at 37°C. Both groups showed a statistically significant difference in nanohardness among the materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An adequate wetting aspect of the denture bases and occlusal devices is important as it has various surface energies that have distinct wettability properties. 34 One study 35 investigated the hardness of the heat-cured and CAD/CAM materials in dry and wet conditions where specimens were stored in water for 30 days at 37°C. Both groups showed a statistically significant difference in nanohardness among the materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendation of water storage for heat‐cured acrylic removable dental appliances is common as the water sorption during the first three months of clinical use compensates for the shrinkage of the material and provides water balance and dimensional stability. An adequate wetting aspect of the denture bases and occlusal devices is important as it has various surface energies that have distinct wettability properties 34 . One study 35 investigated the hardness of the heat‐cured and CAD/CAM materials in dry and wet conditions where specimens were stored in water for 30 days at 37°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual hand geometry produced without the need of complex scanning devices serve as effective design references for improving hand products, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic seriously. On the other hand, PLA indeed provided more supporting constraint satisfaction for reaching more tensile force due to the character of the hardness according to the past research in materials [21] [22]. However, the questionnaire indicated that PLA has less satisfaction than other materials because the splint made by PLA is too hard to wear.…”
Section: Questionnaire Integrationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It can be assumed that the material hardness has an effect on roughness. Light-curing occlusal splint resins are expected to have comparable hardness as auto-polymerizing systems [63,64], but hardness of 3D-printed occlusal splint materials is influenced by the print angle [17]. Martens hardness and indentation modulus depend on post-polymerization and are expected to decrease after water storage [39] [62].…”
Section: Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of a splint treatment depends to a large extent on the patient's compliance. Therefore, in addition to the mechanical requirements, splints should also meet esthetic [16,17], phonetic, and functional [18] demands. Basic esthetic requirements include color stability and surface gloss [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%