2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8574(00)00112-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of heavy metal accumulation in a natural wetland and constructed wetlands receiving acid mine drainage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
87
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
87
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is true for almost all large wetlands. This is consistent with a study published by Mays and Edwards (2001) in which heavy metals Mn, Zn, Cu, Ni and Cr were re- ported to be accumulated in plants; however, the total plant accumulations were substantially less. Furthermore, Barley et al (2005) report that Fe and As are preferentially taken up in plant roots more than the stems and that higher metal concentrations were recorded in sediments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is true for almost all large wetlands. This is consistent with a study published by Mays and Edwards (2001) in which heavy metals Mn, Zn, Cu, Ni and Cr were re- ported to be accumulated in plants; however, the total plant accumulations were substantially less. Furthermore, Barley et al (2005) report that Fe and As are preferentially taken up in plant roots more than the stems and that higher metal concentrations were recorded in sediments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Timescales for detecting changes may be long (75), indicating impacts principally to base flow chemistry. Inferences based on nutrients apply to other contaminants [metals (108) and pesticide (109)], where retention is enabled by low redox conditions and organic matter storage, common features of all wetland settings, including GIWs (28).…”
Section: Fig 2 Across Blocks (A-h Maps Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In different seasons, the load of these two sources might be different. Human activities have easily altered the heavy metal concentrations in the riparian environment (Mays and Edwards 2001;Zhang et al 2009). Therefore, the heavy metal contamination in the riparian zone has attracted increasing concern in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%