1994
DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90136-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
129
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
129
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The abductor muscle moment has been used frequently as a primary parameter for characterizing hip loading [1,11,18,21,24], and a cycle-to-cycle comparison of in vivo measured and calculated hip contact forces and moments showed good agreement [7]. However, computation of joint loading is a complex overdetermined mathematical problem and many loadings can satisfy a given computed moment [2], and therefore, resultant intersegmental moment does not necessarily represent the actual hip loading. Nevertheless, our findings of no changes in the hip abductor lever arm ratio and the hip abductor moment after surgery may suggest the abductor lever arm was not effectively lengthened even after trochanteric advancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abductor muscle moment has been used frequently as a primary parameter for characterizing hip loading [1,11,18,21,24], and a cycle-to-cycle comparison of in vivo measured and calculated hip contact forces and moments showed good agreement [7]. However, computation of joint loading is a complex overdetermined mathematical problem and many loadings can satisfy a given computed moment [2], and therefore, resultant intersegmental moment does not necessarily represent the actual hip loading. Nevertheless, our findings of no changes in the hip abductor lever arm ratio and the hip abductor moment after surgery may suggest the abductor lever arm was not effectively lengthened even after trochanteric advancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurement of joint forces in vivo has been challenging because of issues with miniaturization of electronics, remote powering, long-term durability of electronic components, and safety of the implant design. Hip forces measured through telemetry typically have been lower by 160% to 400% than those predicted mathematically [4,5]. The knee is difficult to model accurately because of its complex geometry, six degrees of freedom, and the major role soft tissues play in stabilizing and directing knee function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In large-scale musculoskeletal models, validity of muscle force estimates has been assessed indi rectly by comparing measured joint reaction forces against those predicted by modeling. Brand et al (1994) compared hip forces predicted by a musculoskeletal model to direct measurements from an instrumented hip implant. They reported that muscle forces were apparently overestimated due to the lack of realistic wrapping of muscle paths around the hip joint, making moment arms smaller than they should have been.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%