1991
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.1069-1071.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay for detection of measles-specific immunoglobulin M antibody

Abstract: During a measles outbreak, 283 serum specimens from 221 suspected cases of measles were tested by immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay for the presence of measles-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies by using commercially available reagents. There was 97% agreement between the two assays; thus, the choice of the method for diagnostic testing is a matter of convenience and experience. In all 62 cases of measles from which a single blood sample was available, measles tgM-specific antibodies were detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measles-IgM detection sensitivity of this ELISA was 96.6% for vaccinated subjects and 100% for nonvaccinated subjects, both of which had complement fixation test-confirmed measles. Similar sensitivities were reported previously when 17 serum samples from nonvaccinated subjects were tested (13) and when this ELISA kit was compared with the immunofluorescence assay by using 72 immunofluorescence assay-positive serum samples (10). Interfering IgG, which might have caused false-negative results because of competition with IgM for attachment sites in the ELISA wells, was eliminated prior to measles-IgM testing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The measles-IgM detection sensitivity of this ELISA was 96.6% for vaccinated subjects and 100% for nonvaccinated subjects, both of which had complement fixation test-confirmed measles. Similar sensitivities were reported previously when 17 serum samples from nonvaccinated subjects were tested (13) and when this ELISA kit was compared with the immunofluorescence assay by using 72 immunofluorescence assay-positive serum samples (10). Interfering IgG, which might have caused false-negative results because of competition with IgM for attachment sites in the ELISA wells, was eliminated prior to measles-IgM testing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Maximal average levels of specific IgM were reached between days 5 and 10 after the onset of rash. This is in agreement with earlier studies with total IgM isolated by sucrose gradient and tested by HI (day 10) (6) or by IgM Enzygnost (days 5 to 10) (28,32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the overall sensitivity strongly depends on the number of sera collected during the later time points. In some studies only 0, 8, 5, or 4.5% of the samples were collected after day 15 (32), day 19 (23), day 25 (26), or day 30 (1), respectively. In contrast, 37% of the samples in our study were drawn after day 20 and 25% of the samples were collected after day 30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations