2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2017.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of impact-abrasive wear characteristics and performance of direct quenched (DQ) and direct quenched and partitioned (DQ&P) steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite aggressive test conditions-high-speed and long-time-period tests-the volume loss of the coatings was relatively low, and there is only a small opportunity to compare the achieved results with other works because of a lack of test results for thermally sprayed coatings tested under dry-pot erosive test conditions. Some results can be found in the works of N. Ojala [35][36][37][38][39], but the authors often used slurry-pot erosive tests, for which the conditions were quite different. The low volume loss was the manifestation of good adhesion of the coatings to the substrate, and particularly between the particles and the matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite aggressive test conditions-high-speed and long-time-period tests-the volume loss of the coatings was relatively low, and there is only a small opportunity to compare the achieved results with other works because of a lack of test results for thermally sprayed coatings tested under dry-pot erosive test conditions. Some results can be found in the works of N. Ojala [35][36][37][38][39], but the authors often used slurry-pot erosive tests, for which the conditions were quite different. The low volume loss was the manifestation of good adhesion of the coatings to the substrate, and particularly between the particles and the matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the water quenched sample, the microstructure consisted of lath-like martensite comprising packets, blocks, and sub-blocks. The darkest auto-tempered martensite was the most dominant phase in the water quenched microstructure (Figure 3b), as is typical of other commercial medium carbon steels, such as some wear-resistant steels [19][20][21][22][23]. Autotempering is desirable for this type of steel in order to improve the impact toughness in the asquenched state.…”
Section: Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[6,[14][15][16] For a further improvement in the strength of these steels, a martensitic transformation is performed by instant quenching. [4,8,17] Therefore, alloying elements such as Mn, Cr, Mo, Si, and B come to application, which, in dissolved condition, decelerate the diffusion-controlled c to a transformation and enable full martensitic strength. [18] During cooling, Mo retards the pro-eutectoid ferrite and perlite transformation [19] and prevents the Nb-precipitation to Nb(CN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the influences of the rolling conditions and FRTs on the mechanical properties of the martensitic steel product are largely scientifically explored. [8,16,17] Nevertheless, there is a lack of research, if the rolling conditions and especially the FRTs influence both M S and hardening characteristics. To investigate the effect of the FRT on the hardenability, a rolling scenario with two different FRTs was performed on a Deformation Dilatometer Ba¨hr 805 A/D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%