Comparison of in-shoe plantar loading forces between minimalist and maximalist cushion running shoes

Ogston, Jena

doi:10.1080/19424280.2018.1561760

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of this study were also different from another study conducted on treadmill (Ogston, 2019), in which plantar loading was compared between MIN and MAX, a greater plantar loading was observed in MIN when compared to that of MAX. This might be because the running test was conducted on a natural trail in our study while it was conducted on a treadmill in that specific study (Ogston, 2019). The mechanics were not therefore fully comparable between overground and treadmill running and shoe effects on vertical loading rates were different during overground and treadmill running (Chambon et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…The mechanics were not therefore fully comparable between overground and treadmill running and shoe effects on vertical loading rates were different during overground and treadmill running (Chambon et al, 2015). Finally, all trail runners did not have any experience in either styles of shoes (MIN or MAX) in our study, whereas the subjects had previous experience of wearing MIN in those previous studies Sinclair 2017) and the runners habitually wore maximal cushioned shoes in the study by Ogston (2019). An et al (2015) found that vertical loading rates were greater during downhill running in comparison to level or uphill running.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of minimalist and maximalist shoes on impact loading and footstrike pattern in habitual rearfoot strike trail runners: An in‐field study

Chan

Lai

et al. 2020

European Journal of Sport Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Running-related injuries among trail runners are very common and footwear selection may 7 modulate the injury risk. However, most previous studies were conducted in a laboratory 8 environment. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of two contrasting 9 footwear design, minimalist (MIN) and maximalist shoes (MAX), on the running 10 biomechanics of trail runners during running on a natural trail. Eighteen habitual rearfoot 11 strike trail runners completed level, uphill and downhill running at their preferred speeds in 12 both shod conditions. Peak tibial acceleration, strike index and footstrike pattern were 13 compared between the two footwear and slopes. Interactions of footwear and slope were not 14 detected for all the selected variables. There was no significant effect from footwear (F=1.23, 15 p=0.27) and slope (F=2.49, p=0.09) on peak tibial acceleration and there was no footwear 16 effect on strike index (F=3.82, p=0.056). A significant main effect of slope on strike index 17 (F=13.24, p<0.001) was found. Strike index during uphill running was significantly greater 18 (i.e., landing with a more anterior foot strike) when compared with level (p<0.001, Cohen's 19 d=1.72) or downhill running (p<0.001, Cohen's d=1.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%