Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems

Chitnis, Deepti; Dunn, William J.; Gonzales, David A.

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.011

Cited by 28 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fuji Ortho LC is a light-cured RMGIC for specific use in orthodontics. It have been shown that the SBS of Fuji Ortho LC is similar to that achieved by chemically and light-cured composite resins (9). The current findings indicate that Fuji Ortho LC used on etched enamel in the presence of a thin film of water is capable of providing a shear bond strength that is able to withstand routine orthodontic forces.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 54%

Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives

Vicente¹,

Toledano²,

La³

et al. 2010

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength and site of failure of brackets bonded to dry and wet enamel. Study design: 50 teeth were divided into ten groups of 5 teeth each (10 surfaces). In half the groups enamel was kept dry before bonding, and in the other half distilled water was applied to wet the surface after etching. The following groups were established: 1)Acid/Transbond-XT (dry/wet) XT; 2) Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TSEP)/Transbond-XT paste (dry/wet); 3) Concise (dry), Transbond MIP/Concise (wet), 4) FujiOrtho-LC (dry/ wet); 5) SmartBond (dry/wet). Brackets were bonded to both buccal and lingual surfaces. Specimens were stored in distilled water (24 hours at 37ºC) and thermocycled. Brackets were debonded using a Universal testing machine (cross-head speed 1 mm/min). Failure sites were classified using a stereomicroscope. Results: No significant differences in bond strength were detected between the adhesives under wet and dry conditions except for SmartBond, whose bond strength was significantly lower under dry conditions. For all the adhesives most bond failures were of mixed site location except for Smartbond, which failed at the adhesive-bracket interface. Conclusions: Under wet conditions the bonding capacity of the adhesives tested was similar than under dry conditions, with the exception of SmartBond which improved under wet conditions. Moisture, resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement, moisture-insensitive primer, moisture-active primer, self-etching primer, brackets, bonding. Key words:

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 54%

Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives

Vicente¹,

Toledano²,

La³

et al. 2010

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In previous reports, the bond strength to ground enamel ranged from 23.0 to 57.2 MPa for SE, [28][29][30][31] from 19.5 to 38.4 MPa for XIII [28][29] and was above 24 MPa for FB. 32 Discrepancies regarding the previously reported bond strength values might result from the different surface treatments, different modes of measurement and different operators. [33][34] Regarding the effect of saliva contamination on the enamel bond strength of self-etching adhesives, in previous studies, self-etching adhesives were usually used prior to bracket bonding [6][7][8][9][10][16][17][18][26][27] or placement of the fissure sealants [21][22][23] and they were rarely applied with salivary contamination for resin restorations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

“…Giomer (FL-Bond II/Beautifil II) in the current study performed similarly to the bond strength after one-hour storage in the previous report; however, it performed lower than the bond strength after sevenday storage. 32 For the first time, the current findings indicate that saliva contamination had an adverse effect on the bond strength of Giomer CONCLUSIONS 1. Hydrophilic self-etching adhesives are negatively influenced by saliva contamination.…”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

“…48 Unlike compomers, the reaction of polyalkenoic acid with fluoroaluminosilicate glass particles takes place before inclusion in the silica-filled urethane resin. 32 Giomer requires an application of FL-Bond II (a self-etching adhesive containing S-PRG nanofillers) prior to placement. Giomer (FL-Bond II/Beautifil II) in the current study performed similarly to the bond strength after one-hour storage in the previous report; however, it performed lower than the bond strength after sevenday storage.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Saliva Contamination and Decontamination on Bovine Enamel Bond Strength of Four Self-etching Adhesives

Jiang¹,

Pan²,

Liu³

et al. 2010

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYObjective: This study evaluated the effect of saliva contamination on the bovine enamel microtensile bond strengths (µTBS) of four selfetching adhesives. Materials and Methods: The labial enamel surfaces of extracted non-carious bovine incisors were serially wet ground. The enamel surfaces were not contaminated (Group A), contaminated with saliva before/after priming (Groups B/C) or they were water-sprayed after salivary contamination occurred before/ after priming (Groups D/E). Four self-etching adhesives and the corresponding resin composites from the same manufacturer (Clearfil SE Bond + Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray Co; Xeno III + Ceram X, Densply; Frog + Ice, SDI; FL Bond II + Beautifil II, Shofu Inc) were applied onto the enamel surfaces. The µTBS tests were performed with a micro tester (BISCO, Inc). The enamel surface was analyzed with AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy) before/after salivary contamination occurred or after the saliva-contaminated enamel was water-sprayed. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, factorial design ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's HSD multiple comparisons. Salivary contamination before and after priming could significantly reduce the enamel bond strength of self-etching adhesives. Proper isolation should be performed before and during application of the adhesives and placement of the resin composite. Thorough water-spraying could significantly improve the µTBS of saliva-contaminated enamel.

show abstract

“…To date, many commercial adhesives are constituted of these components through co-mixtures of monomers and by changing the filler content [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . To enhance workability, diluents of low molecular weights such as TEGDMA and/or UDMA were usually added.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets

Park

Son

Ko³

et al. 2009

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study tested the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth using flowable resins. A total of 105 human teeth were divided into seven groups. The brackets in each group were bonded to the tooth substrates using a Transbond XT adhesive and six other different flowable resins, respectively. Each adhesive resin was light-cured using a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) light for 40 seconds. The brackets were debonded in shear mode using a universal testing machine. The brackets bonded using Tetric Flow and Grandio Flow showed slightly greater SBS values (13.0±1.8 and 12.2±1.2 MPa, respectively) than the Transbond XT adhesive (12.1±1.2 MPa). However, the SBS values of Transbond XT, X-flow, Tetric Flow, Grandio Flow, and Filtek Z350 flow were not significantly different. As for Admira Flow and Aelite Flow, they scored significantly lower SBS values (7.0±2.1 and 9.2±1.3 MPa, respectively) than the other groups. On bracket failure mode, statistical analysis revealed a similar failure mode among all the seven test groups.

show abstract

Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems

Cited by 28 publications

References 26 publications

Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives

Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives

Effect of Saliva Contamination and Decontamination on Bovine Enamel Bond Strength of Four Self-etching Adhesives

Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About