Comparison of Incisor Mobility after Insertion of Canine-to-Canine Lingual Retainers Bonded to Two or to Six Teeth A Clinical Study

Watted, Nezar; Wieber, Michael; Teuscher, Tobias; Schmitz, Nicole

doi:10.1007/pl00001944

Cited by 27 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Watted's study of 60 patients, separated in 3 groups (two of which are with fixed retainer and one with removable retainer) the dental mobility reduces with the number of teeth, fixed in the retainer [21]. This conclusion was supported by a study of Stormann, which recruited 103 patients [22].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Considerations in the Selection of Retainer Following an Orthodontic Treatment

2017

IJSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

1 (6-12), group 2 (12-21), group 3 (21-40), group 4 (40-61)), type and severity of malocclusion, periodontal status, type of orthodontic appliances, period and type of retention based on data from their records, study models and photo documentation.Results: It was found a correlation between the age, type and severity of malocclusion, periodontal status, type of orthodontic appliances, cooperation of the patient and the choice of retainer. The most commonly used retainers in all patient groups were established. Conclusion: Orthodontic retainers counteract the natural tendency of teeth to return to their original position under the influence of periodontal, occlusal and soft tissue forces.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Considerations in the Selection of Retainer Following an Orthodontic Treatment

2017

IJSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…patients with fixed retainers during the first 6 months of retention. Few studies 5,17 have investigated the impact of removable retainers on periodontal health. Heier et al 5 evaluated the differences between fixed and removable retainers, but only the segment from canine to canine was analyzed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of orthodontic retainers on periodontal health status assessed by biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid

Rody¹,

Akhlaghi²,

Akyalçın³

et al. 2011

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate whether biomarkers of inflammation and periodontal remodeling are differentially expressed in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of patients wearing different types of orthodontic retainers. Materials and Methods: Thirty-one adult subjects (17 men and 14 women with an age range of 20 to 35 years) were allocated to three different groups. Group 1 consisted of 10 patients wearing fixed retainers, group 2 included 11 patients using lower removable retainers, and group 3 comprised 10 patients without retainers (control). Periodontal health assessment and GCF collection were carried out at two sites per subject: the lingual side of a central lower incisor and the lingual side of a lower second premolar. Aliquots from diluted GCF were screened for the presence of biomarkers using a microarray technique. Results: Group 1 patients exhibited a higher percentage of sites with visible plaque in the incisor region than the other groups (P 5 .03); no differences were noted in gingival bleeding and probing depths. The median concentrations (pg/mL) of interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 were significantly higher in the premolar sites of patients in group 2 (P 5 .01 and P 5 .04, respectively), whereas the concentration of matrix metalloproteinase-9 was significantly higher at the incisors of patients wearing fixed retainers (P 5 .02). A significant difference between the two sites was seen only in group 2. Conclusions: The presence of different orthodontic retainers may promote specific alterations in the GCF composition. With retention periods potentially becoming longer, this finding may be of clinical significance. (Angle Orthod. 2011;81:1083-1089

show abstract

“…With a total of 60 participants, divided into 3 equal groups (2 groups with mandibular bonded retainers and one control group with removable retainers), the study results revealed that tooth mobility decreased with the number teeth bonded to the retainer [20].…”

Section: IIImentioning

confidence: 99%

Fixed Retainers Vs Removable Retainers – Which Is Better?

Bds¹

2013

IOSR-JDMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Incisor Mobility after Insertion of Canine-to-Canine Lingual Retainers Bonded to Two or to Six Teeth A Clinical Study

Cited by 27 publications

References 7 publications

Considerations in the Selection of Retainer Following an Orthodontic Treatment

Considerations in the Selection of Retainer Following an Orthodontic Treatment

Impact of orthodontic retainers on periodontal health status assessed by biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid

Fixed Retainers Vs Removable Retainers – Which Is Better?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About