2022
DOI: 10.1002/lary.30212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Inhaled Drug Delivery in Patients With One‐ and Two‐level Laryngotracheal Stenosis

Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) is a functionally devastating condition with high respiratory morbidity and mortality. This preliminary study investigates airflow dynamics and stenotic drug delivery in patients with one‐ and two‐level LTS. Study Design A Computational Modeling Restropective Cohort Study. Methods Computed tomography scans from seven LTS patients, five with one‐level (three subglottic, two tracheal), and two with two‐level (glottis + trachea, glottis + subglottis) were used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed an advantage of trans-tracheostomal inhalation over trans-oral inhalation in the amount of drug particles that deposit in the subglottis (total deposition fraction of 3.63% for trans-tracheostomal vs. 0.11% for trans-oral, ~30 times higher). The low deposition fraction of drug in the subglottis via trans-oral inhalation was also observed in recent studies by Frank-Ito et al, which showed drug depositions between 0.06% to 2.6% in models of subglottic and tracheal stenosis [ 19 , 32 ]. These low fractions emphasize the need to increase drug deposition in the stenotic areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study showed an advantage of trans-tracheostomal inhalation over trans-oral inhalation in the amount of drug particles that deposit in the subglottis (total deposition fraction of 3.63% for trans-tracheostomal vs. 0.11% for trans-oral, ~30 times higher). The low deposition fraction of drug in the subglottis via trans-oral inhalation was also observed in recent studies by Frank-Ito et al, which showed drug depositions between 0.06% to 2.6% in models of subglottic and tracheal stenosis [ 19 , 32 ]. These low fractions emphasize the need to increase drug deposition in the stenotic areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In such a case, the patient may benefit from both trans-oral and trans-tracheostomal inhalations. This idea was supported by a simulation study of trans-oral inhalation in two multilevel stenosis subjects [ 32 ], with a superior deposition shown at the lower (tracheal) stenosis in both subjects. In addition to the lower deposition rate in the lungs, TRCI also demonstrated a lower deposition rate in the oral cavity and pharynx compared to the trans-oral technique (7.9% vs. 10.5%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical usage of inhaled corticosteroids is typically limited to systemic delivery. However, inhalation‐based delivery systems have been investigated and could offer more localized delivery of drug‐loaded microparticles 29 . Our approach extends this concept with the addition of a stent, which helps to ensure the drug‐eluting particles remain at the injury site, limiting chances of off‐target effects from the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure numerically accurate flow simulation results, the Shear-Stress Transport k -ω turbulent model (SST k -ω) was employed to simulate the inspiratory and expiratory airflow for fast-breathing conditions (45 L/min) [ 27 ]. The turbulence length scale was considered 0.001 m, and turbulent intensity was assumed to be 5% at the inlet and outlet [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%