2009
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2009011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of instruments for geoelectrical soil mapping at the field scale

Abstract: In precision agriculture geoelectrical methods have shown their capability to detect spatial variation of important physico-chemical soil parameters in an efficient way. Nevertheless, relationships between the electrical parameters (electrical conductivity or resistivity) and other soil properties are not always consistent over different fields. This can, to some extent, be due to the characteristics of instruments used for soil mapping. However, a limited amount of research has addressed this issue. In this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Percentages of sand (between 77.8 and 86.2 %), silt (between 8 and 14.8 %) and clay (between 4.8 and 9.4 %) always indicated this soil classification, in agreement with the previous work in the area nearby (Gebbers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Experimental Sitesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Percentages of sand (between 77.8 and 86.2 %), silt (between 8 and 14.8 %) and clay (between 4.8 and 9.4 %) always indicated this soil classification, in agreement with the previous work in the area nearby (Gebbers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Experimental Sitesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The landscape at the site was formed during the last ice age. Soil consists in the upper one meter of 75 % sand, 17.2 % silt and 7.8 % clay (Gebbers et al, 2009). Texture analysis was done for a number of nearsurface samples, and a loamy sand type is predominant in all 19 selected sampling locations (Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, spatial changes in soil EC a have been linked to spatial soil heterogeneity [1][2][3][4]. In non-saline, non-hydromorphic mineral soils, the particle size distribution (soil texture) in combination with related soil attributes is typically the most influential factor for spatial variation of soil EC a [5], as smaller particles (clay and fine silt) are related to higher ion concentrations (greater surface charge) and superior water storage (smaller pore size).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gebbers et al (2009) compared data in the same area collected with various geoelectrical instruments for mapping at the field scale including a multi-electrode system, such as the SuperSting R8 used in this study, and a Veris mapper. They noted that comparison between instruments should only be made when the electrode spacing and signal depth of penetrations are the same.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5C). The direct contact method is used for measuring surface geoelectrical properties at the field scale and has been used by numerous researchers (Gebbers et al, 2009;Molin and Faulin, 2013;Doolittle and Brevik, 2014). Higher EC a has been correlated to higher clay content in clay-pan soils .…”
Section: Electrical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%