2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.segan.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of integer and fractional order robust controllers for DC/DC converter feeding constant power load in a DC microgrid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed approach, we solve a problem associated with the stabilisation of a DC–DC power converter feeding a constant power load (CPL), which is a current issue in power electronics [26]. The closest solution to this problem using elements of fractional‐order control can be found in [27], where a sliding mode controller with a fractional sliding surface is considered for analysis. However, it can be noticed in the simulation of Section 4 of [27] that the controller requires the online solution of a traditional fractional‐order Caputo derivative, whose ‘integration’ results in a double integral loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed approach, we solve a problem associated with the stabilisation of a DC–DC power converter feeding a constant power load (CPL), which is a current issue in power electronics [26]. The closest solution to this problem using elements of fractional‐order control can be found in [27], where a sliding mode controller with a fractional sliding surface is considered for analysis. However, it can be noticed in the simulation of Section 4 of [27] that the controller requires the online solution of a traditional fractional‐order Caputo derivative, whose ‘integration’ results in a double integral loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closest solution to this problem using elements of fractional‐order control can be found in [27], where a sliding mode controller with a fractional sliding surface is considered for analysis. However, it can be noticed in the simulation of Section 4 of [27] that the controller requires the online solution of a traditional fractional‐order Caputo derivative, whose ‘integration’ results in a double integral loop. Additional to the fact that the CPL requires a higher bandwidth than a typical stand‐alone operation, this results in a non‐trivial computational effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Lyapunov based method showed promising performance , however the energy management unit is not reported in subject work. In [30,31], centralized robust and optimal controllers are reported for stability issues in DC micro-grid, however the effects of communication link such as network delays and its failure have not investigated. In [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] several other nonlinear control methods have been proposed with energy management units but all the presented methods are integer order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…robust behavior to the measurement noise and oscillations. Several fractional order controllers have been reported in the literature such as DC-DC converters feeding constant power loads [31], robust non integer controller applied to nonlinear dynamic system [38][39] and fuzzy fractional controller to servo systems [40][41]. Based on the above literature survey, this paper proposes a decentralized super twisting fractional order control in-tegrated with energy management unit for the proposed DC micro-grid shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%