2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulae in Pediatric Eyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
59
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9]11 Neely et al 7 reported a mean PE of 0.3 D (SD-1.5 D). They also reported that among the formulae tested, that is, SRK II, SRK-T, Holladay 1, and Hoffer Q, there was no significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9]11 Neely et al 7 reported a mean PE of 0.3 D (SD-1.5 D). They also reported that among the formulae tested, that is, SRK II, SRK-T, Holladay 1, and Hoffer Q, there was no significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our results are similar to many other published pediatric studies, which have also reported greater APE in eyes with shorter AL. 5,8,11,12 There is only one study in the literature 12 comparing the effect of personalizing the lens constant on the predictive accuracy of the IOL calculation formula. However, this is a very specialized subset of infant eyes below the age of 7 months with unilateral cataracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations