2013
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.74.2.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of inversion recovery gradient echo with inversion recovery fast spin echo techniques for magnetic resonance imaging detection of navicular bone marrow lesions in horses

Abstract: Results suggested that the IRGE sequence revealed BMLs significantly less conspicuously, compared with the standard STIR sequence. The 2 techniques cannot be used interchangeably, and IRGE is therefore not recommended as the sole fat-suppressed sequence for routine equine standing MRI protocols.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the STIR sequence was as poorly sensitive (67%) and less specific (83%) than the T1W sequence. This is in contrast to the high sensitivity of fat‐suppressed sequences such as STIR for pathology in musculoskeletal and postmortem imaging in both human and veterinary medicine (8,14–16). In fact, fat‐suppressed sequences are routinely used in forensic postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) to rapidly survey cadavers for hyperintense regions—so‐called “forensic sentinel signs”—in any tissue, organ, or cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, the STIR sequence was as poorly sensitive (67%) and less specific (83%) than the T1W sequence. This is in contrast to the high sensitivity of fat‐suppressed sequences such as STIR for pathology in musculoskeletal and postmortem imaging in both human and veterinary medicine (8,14–16). In fact, fat‐suppressed sequences are routinely used in forensic postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) to rapidly survey cadavers for hyperintense regions—so‐called “forensic sentinel signs”—in any tissue, organ, or cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%