1988
DOI: 10.4064/sm-88-1-23-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of joint spectra for certain classes of commuting operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that if k e Sp (7), then (Re(X), Im(X)) € Sp(7r (7), where Re(£), lm(P) are respectively the real and the imaginary parts of p. It is also known [15] that every tuple of commuting spectral operators has an admissible partition. Thus using this results one can carry over Proposition 3.2 to arbitrary tuples consisting of commuting spectral operators.…”
Section: (Y(n(t)))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that if k e Sp (7), then (Re(X), Im(X)) € Sp(7r (7), where Re(£), lm(P) are respectively the real and the imaginary parts of p. It is also known [15] that every tuple of commuting spectral operators has an admissible partition. Thus using this results one can carry over Proposition 3.2 to arbitrary tuples consisting of commuting spectral operators.…”
Section: (Y(n(t)))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McIntosh, Pryde and Ricker [McIntosh et al 1988] proved that for the k-tuple of commuting bounded generalized scalar operators, the spectrum σ (T ) coincides with many known joint spectra of the (T 1 , . .…”
Section: The Support Of the Functional Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davis [6] drew special attention to this problem and its importance; after that Mcintosh and Pryde [10] introduced a novel idea, the use of Clifford algebras, to develop a functional calculus for commuting tuples of operators and used this to extend earlier perturbation results from [4]. This approach was developed further by them and Ricker [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%