2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography With Megavoltage Projection Pairs for Paraspinal Radiosurgery Patient Alignment and Position Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of treatments given using in-room CT, pairs of MV localization images and implanted markers, and cone-beam localization were 1, 55, and 35, respectively. The systematic uncertainties of MV and cone-beam–guided setups in our clinic have been studied and found to be on the of order 1.0 mm and 0.3 mm, respectively (18). The random uncertainties of registration of the markers implanted into the spine using MV images was found to be 0.5 mm ± 0.5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of treatments given using in-room CT, pairs of MV localization images and implanted markers, and cone-beam localization were 1, 55, and 35, respectively. The systematic uncertainties of MV and cone-beam–guided setups in our clinic have been studied and found to be on the of order 1.0 mm and 0.3 mm, respectively (18). The random uncertainties of registration of the markers implanted into the spine using MV images was found to be 0.5 mm ± 0.5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random uncertainties of the cone-beam CT registration were found to be less than or equal to those of the MV technique. In consequence, the combined overall uncertainty in target positioning is estimated to be less than 2 mm for both techniques (18). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGRT systems can be broken down into those based on stereoscopic xray-and CT-based imaging. For spine SBRT, the target can be positioned accurately to within 1-2 mm and 1°-2° with either IGRT system, 9,22,25,27,34 but there are inherent differences between the two that require discussion.…”
Section: Guidance With Ct-based or Stereoscopic X-ray Imaging To Verimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RC-CBCT scan uses a kilovoltage x-ray imaging system (On-Board Imaging, Varian Medical Systems), which has been described in detail in Ref. 21.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%