2014
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Lifts Versus Tape Measure in Determining Leg Length Discrepancy

Abstract: The indirect standing method of LLD measurement using lifts had superior validity, interobserver reliability, and specificity in comparison with radiograph over the direct supine method using tape measure. Both clinical methods underestimated LLD compared with radiograph.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Complications, revisions, and implant failures were recorded. Leg length and offset was evaluated before and after surgery by tape measure [ 17 , 18 ]. Offset was based on the contralateral hip; an offset difference ≤ 5 mm was considered a good result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications, revisions, and implant failures were recorded. Leg length and offset was evaluated before and after surgery by tape measure [ 17 , 18 ]. Offset was based on the contralateral hip; an offset difference ≤ 5 mm was considered a good result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 Leg length measurements included direct measurement of each limb, measuring from the top of the anterior superior iliac spine to the medial malleolus on standing position. 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies were subjected to validity studies only (10,17), while 4 were subjected to reliability analysis only (11,(18)(19)(20). Validity and reliability analyses were applied to 5 studies simultaneously (3,7,8,21,22).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies that evaluated the validity of TMM, only Neelly et al (7) and Gogia et al (3) studies had used 2 examiners and in other studies only one examiner's evaluation was compared to the reference method (8,10,17,21,22). Moreover, only Beatie et al (10) study compared the validity of TMM in healthy (ICC: 0.359-0.786) and patient (ICC: 0.770-0.852) groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%